Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Back to Questions
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #2879 Civilisation
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
Civilisation is not inimical to health and long life. The contrary is true, for as the people advance they learn to master the forces of nature and with these forces under control, they are able to lead better, healthier lives; but if they become too soft and luxurious, there is a decay of moral and physical fiber. Civilisation is favourable to long life so long as the people are moderate and live simply, but when it degenerates to sensuous softness, individual and racial deterioration ensue. Too generous a supply of food, too little physical activity and packed food are some of the luxuries which are generally introduced with civilisation.

Which of the following most accurately summarises the opinion of the author in the text?

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "Life of immoderation is neither natural nor desirable."

Explanation: This option accurately captures the author's opinion. The text argues that while civilisation can promote health, it becomes detrimental when it leads to immoderation and luxury. The phrase 'neither natural nor desirable' aligns with the author's warning about the dangers of excessive comfort and the decay of moral and physical fiber, supporting the main idea that moderation is key to a healthy life.

Option 1: "Civilisation must suffer the consequences of self-control and self-denial."

Explanation: This option misinterprets the author's view. The text does not suggest that civilisation suffers from self-control and self-denial; rather, it indicates that moderation is essential for health and longevity. The phrase 'self-control and self-denial' implies a negative consequence, which contradicts the author's argument that moderation leads to better lives.

Option 2: "Unnecessary waste of life is the natural consequence of civilisation."

Explanation: This option inaccurately reflects the author's opinion. The text does not claim that civilisation leads to a waste of life; instead, it argues that civilisation can promote health if people live moderately. The term 'unnecessary waste of life' suggests a fatalistic view that is not supported by the text.

Option 3: "People should live in comfort and health beyond what is now considered old age."

Explanation: This option misrepresents the author's stance. The text emphasizes moderation and simplicity rather than advocating for excessive comfort or health beyond current standards. The phrase 'beyond what is now considered old age' implies an unrealistic expectation that contradicts the author's warning against immoderation.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...