Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #32979 Balance of Nature
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
An understanding of man's effect on the balance of nature is crucial to being able to find the appropriate remedial action. It is a very common belief that the problems of the population explosion are caused mainly by poor people living in poor countries who do not know enough to limit their reproduction. This is not true. The actual number of people in an area is not as important as the effect they have on nature. Developing countries do have an effect on their environment, but it is the populations of richer countries that have a far greater impact on the earth as a whole. For example, tropical forests are known to be essential to the balance of nature, yet we are destroying them at a great rate. They are being cleared not to benefit the natives of that country, but to satisfy the needs of rich countries. Central American forests are being destroyed for grassland to make pet food in the United States cheaper; in Papua New Guinea, forests are destroyed to supply cheaper cardboard packaging for Japanese electronic products; in Burma and Thailand, forests have been destroyed to produce more attractive furniture in Singapore and Hong Kong. Therefore, a rich person living thousands of miles away may cause more tropical forest destruction than a poor person living in the forest itself.

In the author's opinion,

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "rich countries exercise worse influence on environment than poor countries."

Explanation: This option accurately reflects the author's argument that the populations of richer countries have a far greater impact on the environment compared to those in poorer countries. The text supports this by providing examples of how rich countries contribute to environmental degradation.

Option 1: "developing countries should be responsible for environmental problems."

Explanation: The text argues against the common belief that poor countries are primarily responsible for environmental issues. Instead, it emphasizes that the impact of richer countries is more significant, thus this option misrepresents the author's stance.

Option 2: "overpopulation in the world is created by the developed countries."

Explanation: While the text discusses the impact of rich countries, it does not claim that they create overpopulation. The focus is on the environmental impact rather than attributing overpopulation to developed nations, making this option inaccurate.

Option 4: "all countries should bring the population growth under control."

Explanation: The text does not advocate for controlling population growth universally; rather, it critiques the misconception that poor countries are the main contributors to environmental problems. This option oversimplifies the author's argument and does not align with the text's message.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...