Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Back to Questions
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #32981 MCS-R6
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
Civilization is not inimical to health and long life. In fact, the contrary is true, for as the people advance they learn to master the forces of nature and with these forces under control they are able to lead better, healthier lives; but if they become too soft and luxurious, there is decay of moral and physical fiber. Civilization is favorable to long life so long as the people are moderate and live simply, but when it degenerates to sensuous softness, individual and racial deterioration ensue. Too generous a supply of food, too little physical activity and packed food are some of the luxuries which are generally introduced with civilization.

Which of the following most accurately summarizes the opinion of the author in the text?

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "Life of immoderation is neither natural nor desirable."

Explanation: This option accurately reflects the author's opinion. The text argues that while civilization can promote health, it warns against the dangers of immoderation, which leads to deterioration. The phrase 'neither natural nor desirable' aligns with the author's view that excessive luxury and lack of moderation are harmful.

Option 1: "Civilization must suffer the consequences of self-control and self-denial."

Explanation: This option misinterprets the author's view. The text suggests that civilization can lead to better health if moderation is practiced, rather than suffering from self-control. The phrase 'self-control and self-denial' implies a negative consequence, which contradicts the author's argument that moderation is beneficial.

Option 2: "Unnecessary waste of life is the natural consequence of civilization."

Explanation: This option inaccurately summarizes the author's opinion. The text does not state that civilization leads to a waste of life; instead, it argues that civilization can promote health if people live moderately. The term 'unnecessary waste' is not supported by the text.

Option 3: "People should live in comfort and health beyond what is now considered old age."

Explanation: This option misrepresents the author's stance. The text emphasizes moderation and simplicity rather than advocating for excessive comfort or health beyond current standards. The idea of living 'beyond what is now considered old age' does not align with the author's warning against immoderation.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...