Part of the Harris and Gass hypothesis about the Red Sea rift would be weakened if it could be demonstrated that the composition of upper rock layers
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "cannot provide information about the nature of underlying rocks"
Explanation: This option directly contradicts the Harris and Gass hypothesis, which asserts that differences in the composition of upper rock layers give clues to the nature of the underlying igneous rocks. If it were shown that the upper layers cannot provide such information, it would weaken their hypothesis significantly.
Option 1: "cannot cause a suture to develop"
Explanation: This option suggests that the composition of upper rock layers is irrelevant to the development of a suture. However, the text does not discuss causation in this manner; it focuses on the differences in composition providing clues about underlying rocks, not on whether they can cause a suture.
Option 2: "has no effect on where a suture will occur"
Explanation: This option implies that the composition of upper rock layers does not influence the location of a suture. The text does not support this claim, as it emphasizes the significance of observable differences in rock composition in understanding the geological context.
Option 4: "is similar on the two sides of a rift unless a suture divides the two sides"
Explanation: This option suggests that similarity in upper rock layers is contingent upon the presence of a suture. However, the text indicates that Harris and Gass argue against the idea of similarity, asserting that the upper layers have not been shown to be similar, which contradicts this option.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation