Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #33188 MCS-R12
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
Although the hormone adrenaline is known to regulate memory storage, it does not pass from the blood into brain cells. We are faced with an apparent paradox: how can a hormone that does not act directly on the brain have such a large effect on brain function? Recently, we tested the possibility that one of the hormone's actions outside the brain might be responsible. Since one consequence of adrenaline release in an animal is an increase in blood glucose levels, we examined the effects of glucose on memory in rats. We found that glucose injected immediately after training enhances memory tested the next day. Additional evidence was provided by negative findings: drugs called adrenergic antagonists, which block peripheral adrenaline receptors, disrupted adrenaline's ability to regulate memory but did not affect memory enhancements produced by glucose that was not stimulated by adrenaline. These results are as they should be if adrenaline affects memory modulation by increasing blood glucose levels.

The primary purpose of the passage is to

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "present evidence that may help to resolve an apparent contradiction"

Explanation: This option correctly identifies the primary purpose of the passage. The text discusses the paradox of how adrenaline, which does not enter the brain, can still affect memory. It presents evidence from experiments showing that glucose, influenced by adrenaline, enhances memory, thereby addressing the contradiction. This aligns with the passage's goal of providing evidence to clarify the relationship between adrenaline and memory.

Option 1: "reconcile two opposing theories"

Explanation: This option suggests that the passage aims to bring together two conflicting theories. However, the text does not present two distinct theories to reconcile; instead, it discusses the paradox of adrenaline's effect on memory without opposing theories. Therefore, this option does not accurately reflect the passage's purpose.

Option 2: "compare two different explanations for a phenomenon"

Explanation: This option implies that the passage compares two separate explanations. The text does not provide two different explanations for the phenomenon of memory modulation; rather, it focuses on how adrenaline's effect on blood glucose levels may explain its influence on memory. Thus, this option misrepresents the passage's intent.

Option 3: "describe experimental research that appears to support an unpopular theory"

Explanation: While the passage does describe experimental research, it does not indicate that the theory being supported is unpopular. The focus is on the relationship between adrenaline, glucose, and memory, rather than on the popularity of the theory. Therefore, this option does not accurately capture the primary purpose of the passage.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...