The primary purpose of the passage is to
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "present evidence that may help to resolve an apparent contradiction"
Explanation: This option correctly identifies the primary purpose of the passage. The text discusses the paradox of how adrenaline, which does not enter the brain, can still affect memory. It presents evidence from experiments showing that glucose, influenced by adrenaline, enhances memory, thereby addressing the contradiction. This aligns with the passage's goal of providing evidence to clarify the relationship between adrenaline and memory.
Option 1: "reconcile two opposing theories"
Explanation: This option suggests that the passage aims to bring together two conflicting theories. However, the text does not present two distinct theories to reconcile; instead, it discusses the paradox of adrenaline's effect on memory without opposing theories. Therefore, this option does not accurately reflect the passage's purpose.
Option 2: "compare two different explanations for a phenomenon"
Explanation: This option implies that the passage compares two separate explanations. The text does not provide two different explanations for the phenomenon of memory modulation; rather, it focuses on how adrenaline's effect on blood glucose levels may explain its influence on memory. Thus, this option misrepresents the passage's intent.
Option 3: "describe experimental research that appears to support an unpopular theory"
Explanation: While the passage does describe experimental research, it does not indicate that the theory being supported is unpopular. The focus is on the relationship between adrenaline, glucose, and memory, rather than on the popularity of the theory. Therefore, this option does not accurately capture the primary purpose of the passage.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation