The passage is primarily concerned with
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "suggesting an answer to a theoretical question"
Explanation: The passage primarily discusses the theoretical question of whether meteorite impacts on Earth could have sent rocks to Mars. It presents findings from astronomer S. A. Phinney that suggest a possible answer to this question, making this option the correct choice.
Option 1: "presenting an argument to support a particular hypothesis"
Explanation: This option suggests that the passage is focused on arguing for a specific hypothesis. However, the text does not present a clear argument or support for a hypothesis; rather, it discusses findings and raises questions about meteorite impacts.
Option 3: "questioning the assumptions of a research project"
Explanation: This option implies that the passage critiques the assumptions of a specific research project. However, the text does not question any assumptions; it rather explores the implications of meteorite impacts without challenging existing research.
Option 4: "criticizing experimental results"
Explanation: This option suggests that the passage critiques experimental results. However, the text does not criticize any results; it presents findings from a computer simulation without any negative commentary on the results themselves.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation