Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #33388 meteorites
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
Recently some scientists have concluded that meteorites found on Earth and long believed to have a Martian origin might actually have been blasted free of Mars's gravity by the impact on Mars of other meteorites. This conclusion has led to another question: whether meteorite impacts on Earth have similarly driven rocks from this planet to Mars.According to astronomer S. A. Phinney, kicking a rock hard enough to free it from Earth's gravity would require a meteorite capable of making a crater more than 60 miles across. Moreover, even if Earth rocks were freed by meteorite impact, Mars's orbit is much larger than Earth's, so Phinney estimates that the probability of these rocks hitting Mars is about one-tenth as great as that of Mars's rocks hitting Earth. To demonstrate this estimate, Phinney used a computer to calculate where 1,000 hypothetical particles would go if ejected from Earth in random directions. He found that 17 of the 1,000 particles would hit Mars.

The passage is primarily concerned with

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "suggesting an answer to a theoretical question"

Explanation: The passage primarily discusses the theoretical question of whether meteorite impacts on Earth could have sent rocks to Mars. It presents findings from astronomer S. A. Phinney that suggest a possible answer to this question, making this option the correct choice.

Option 1: "presenting an argument to support a particular hypothesis"

Explanation: This option suggests that the passage is focused on arguing for a specific hypothesis. However, the text does not present a clear argument or support for a hypothesis; rather, it discusses findings and raises questions about meteorite impacts.

Option 3: "questioning the assumptions of a research project"

Explanation: This option implies that the passage critiques the assumptions of a specific research project. However, the text does not question any assumptions; it rather explores the implications of meteorite impacts without challenging existing research.

Option 4: "criticizing experimental results"

Explanation: This option suggests that the passage critiques experimental results. However, the text does not criticize any results; it presents findings from a computer simulation without any negative commentary on the results themselves.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...