Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #33585 Mexican Women
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
In The Women of Mexico City, 1796-1857, Sylvia Marina Arrom argues that the status of women in Mexico City improved during the nineteenth century. According to Arrom, households headed by females and instances of women working outside the home were much more common than scholars have estimated; efforts by the Mexican government to encourage female education resulted in increased female literacy; and influential male writers wrote pieces advocating education, employment, and increased family responsibilities for women, while deploring women's political and marital inequality. Mention of the fact that the civil codes of 1870 and 1884 significantly advanced women's rights would have further strengthened Arrom's argument. Arrom does not discuss whether women's improved status counteracted the effects on women of instability in the Mexican economy during the nineteenth century. However, this is not so much a weakness in her work as it is the inevitable result of scholars' neglect of this period. Indeed, such gaps in Mexican history are precisely what make Arrom's pioneering study an important addition to Latin American women's history.

The passage is primarily concerned with doing which of the following?

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "Reviewing a historical study of the status of women in Mexico City during the nineteenth century"

Explanation: The text focuses on Sylvia Marina Arrom's work, which reviews the status of women in Mexico City from 1796 to 1857. It discusses her arguments about improvements in women's status, making it clear that the primary concern of the passage is to review this historical study.

Option 2: "Analyzing the effects of economic instability on the status of women in Mexico during the nineteenth century"

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the passage explicitly states that Arrom does not discuss the effects of economic instability on women's status. Therefore, the text does not analyze this aspect, making this option irrelevant.

Option 3: "Advancing a thesis explaining why women's status in Mexico City improved during the nineteenth century"

Explanation: While the passage mentions improvements in women's status, it does not advance a specific thesis. Instead, it reviews Arrom's arguments and findings, which means this option misrepresents the text's purpose.

Option 4: "Rejecting the thesis that the status of women in Mexico City during the nineteenth century actually improved."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the passage supports the idea that women's status improved, as argued by Arrom. There is no rejection of this thesis; rather, the text reinforces it, making this option contradictory to the main idea presented.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...