Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #33591 David Cressy
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
In a recent study, David Cressy examines two central questions concerning English immigration to New England in the 1630's: what kinds of people immigrated and why? Using contemporary literary evidence, shipping lists, and customs records, Cressy finds that most adult immigrants were skilled in farming or crafts, were literate, and were organized in families. Each of these characteristics sharply distinguishes the 21,000 people who left for New England in the 1630's from most of the approximately 377,000 English people who had immigrating to America by 1700. With respect to their reasons for immigrating, Cressy does not deny the frequently noted fact that some of the immigrants of the 1630's, most notably the organizers and clergy, advanced religious explanations for departure, but he finds that such explanations usually assumed primacy only in retrospect. When he moves beyond the principal actors, he finds that religious explanations were less frequently offered and he concludes that most people immigrated because they were recruited by promises of material improvement.

In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "summarizing the findings of an investigation"

Explanation: The text focuses on David Cressy's study regarding English immigration to New England in the 1630s, detailing the characteristics of the immigrants and their reasons for leaving England. The author presents findings from the study, such as the skills and literacy of the immigrants, which indicates that the primary concern is summarizing these findings.

Option 2: "analyzing a method of argument"

Explanation: This option suggests that the author is focused on the analysis of argumentative methods, which is not the case. The text does not delve into how arguments are constructed or evaluated; instead, it presents findings from a study.

Option 3: "evaluating a point of view"

Explanation: While the author discusses different perspectives on immigration, the main focus is not on evaluating a specific point of view. Instead, the text summarizes findings from Cressy's research rather than critiquing or assessing viewpoints.

Option 4: "hypothesizing about a set of circumstances"

Explanation: This option implies that the author is speculating about possible scenarios, which is not supported by the text. The passage presents concrete findings from a study rather than forming hypotheses about immigration circumstances.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...