Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #34597 Science magazine
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
Early this month, a popular science magazine published research which claims that dogs are able to perceive both the tone of the human voice as well as the meanings of words that are said to them. The researchers believe that the human ability to form words, the basic blocks of language, emerged as a cerebral mechanism to support communication. Words are arbitrary sounds to which we allocate meanings. In spite of dogs not being able to articulate words, they seem to be able to comprehend a wide variety of terms: they sit, they go look for objects, they give their paw, and they wiggle their tail in response to specific words. In order to study how much dogs really understand, a team of experts from the University of Budapest gathered thirteen dogs of different breeds and trained them to stay still inside a magnetic resonance device for about seven minutes, at the same time they played recordings of their owners voices using various combinations of words and tones. Meanwhile, the scientists documented the animals’ cerebral activity.

Which of the following most accurately summarizes the opinion of the author in the text?

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "Dogs can manage to distinguish what is expected from them based on the quality of the sounds of the terms humans utter."

Explanation: This option accurately reflects the author's opinion as it summarizes the main idea that dogs can understand commands and respond appropriately based on the tone and meaning of human words. The text supports this by stating that dogs comprehend a variety of terms and respond to them, indicating their ability to distinguish expected actions.

Option 1: "Scientists from Budapest managed to record the different tones of dogs' voices inside a magnetic resonance device."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text states that the scientists recorded the cerebral activity of dogs while they listened to their owners' voices, not the tones of the dogs' voices. The focus is on how dogs respond to human sounds, not on recording their own vocalizations.

Option 3: "A group of researchers is convinced that dogs are developing a cerebral mechanism in order to be able to finally articulate words."

Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not claim that dogs are developing a mechanism to articulate words. Instead, it discusses how humans developed language and how dogs can understand words without being able to articulate them. The focus is on comprehension, not articulation.

Option 4: "European scientists are training dogs to hear human voices correctly."

Explanation: This option is incorrect as it implies that the scientists are training dogs to hear voices, which is not mentioned in the text. The research focuses on understanding how dogs perceive and respond to human words and tones, rather than training them to hear.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...