Which of the following most accurately summarizes the opinion of the author in the text?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "There is an area in the Sahara desert that is not following the worldwide tendency toward desertification."
Explanation: This option accurately reflects the author's opinion. The text mentions the Sahel region as an exception to the trend of desertification, indicating that it is not following the worldwide tendency. This aligns with the main idea of the text.
Option 1: "Vegetation has slowly been destroying deserts around the world."
Explanation: This option misrepresents the text. The text discusses desertification as a process where vegetation landscapes are becoming dry and eroded, not that vegetation is destroying deserts. Therefore, this statement contradicts the main idea presented.
Option 3: "Droughts are the main cause of the worldwide tendency toward desertification."
Explanation: This option incorrectly identifies the cause of desertification. The text states that the destruction of natural ecosystems is the main cause, not droughts. Thus, this statement is misleading and does not align with the author's argument.
Option 4: "Geographers from England, Sweden, and Denmark have been studying satellite images of the Sahara desert since the 1970s."
Explanation: While this statement is factually correct, it does not summarize the author's opinion or the main idea of the text. The focus of the text is on desertification and the exception of the Sahel region, not solely on the geographers' study.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation