Using this relation and years of observing, Hubble calculated the distance to many of these variable stars. Milton Humason, a fellow astronomer, helped Hubble to calculate the stars’ relative velocities to Earth. When Hubble combined the two data sets he found an interesting relationship: all the stars appeared to be moving away from us! In fact, the speed at which they were moving increased with an increasing distance from Earth. Hubble realized, from this small set of data, that the earth was a part of the expanding universe.
As the universe expands outward in all directions, any observer from a fixed vantage point will look out and see everything running away from them. The further away any two points are, the more the expansion affects them, and the faster they appear to be moving away from each other. Hubble’s result was the first experimental proof that we do not live in a steady-state universe, but rather a dynamic and expanding one.
Which of the following best expresses the main idea of the passage?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "Hubble discovered that the universe is expanding, disproving the theory of the steady-state universe."
Explanation: This option accurately reflects the main idea of the passage. It highlights Hubble's discovery of the universe's expansion and its critical role in disproving the steady-state theory, which is the central theme discussed in the text. The passage emphasizes how Hubble's findings changed the understanding of the universe.
Option 1: "Edwin Hubble discovered Hubble’s Law, a benchmark in modern physics."
Explanation: While it is true that Edwin Hubble discovered Hubble's Law, this option does not capture the main idea of the passage. The passage focuses on the implications of Hubble's discovery regarding the universe's expansion and its impact on cosmological theories, rather than just stating the fact of his discovery.
Option 2: "Before 1929, most physicists supported one of two theories of the universe."
Explanation: This option mentions the support of physicists for two theories but does not address the significant finding of Hubble that led to the understanding of the universe's expansion. The main idea revolves around Hubble's discovery and its implications, not just the historical context of physicists' beliefs.
Option 4: "Modern physics would not have progressed without Hubble’s discovery of the expanding universe."
Explanation: Although Hubble's discovery was significant, this option makes an absolute claim that modern physics would not have progressed without it. The passage does not support this sweeping statement and instead focuses on the specific impact of Hubble's findings on cosmological theories, making this option too broad and not aligned with the main idea.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation