Should human sciences be developed because they will
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "eliminate the destruction caused by a superficial knowledge of the physical world"
Explanation: This option accurately reflects the text's main argument that developing human sciences is essential to address the negative consequences of a superficial understanding of the physical world. The text states that we must look to human sciences to undo the evils resulting from such knowledge, making this option the correct choice.
Option 1: "make us conscious of the changing world"
Explanation: This option suggests that human sciences will make us aware of changes in the world. However, the text emphasizes the need for awareness of changes within ourselves due to new knowledge, not just the external world. Therefore, this option does not align with the main idea of the text.
Option 2: "make us conscious of the changing in ourselves"
Explanation: While this option is closer to the text's theme, it is still incorrect. The text discusses the importance of understanding the changes in ourselves as a result of new knowledge, but it does not state that human sciences will solely make us conscious of these changes. The phrasing 'changing in ourselves' is also grammatically awkward, making this option less precise.
Option 4: "provide more knowledge of the physical world"
Explanation: This option incorrectly implies that the goal of human sciences is to increase our knowledge of the physical world. The text argues that the superficial knowledge of the physical world has led to problems, and it is the understanding of human sciences that will help us progress. Thus, this option does not align with the text's focus on addressing the consequences of existing knowledge.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation