How does the promotion of car-sharing schemes contribute to eco-friendly travel options according to the text?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "By providing a cost-effective and greener alternative to private car ownership"
Explanation: This option accurately reflects the text's assertion that car-sharing schemes offer a cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative to owning a private car. This aligns with the overall theme of promoting sustainable urban mobility.
Option 1: "By offering a quieter and smoother ride"
Explanation: This option refers to the benefits of electric buses mentioned in the text, not car-sharing schemes. The quieter and smoother ride is not related to car-sharing, making this option irrelevant.
Option 2: "By making cycling safer and more appealing"
Explanation: This statement pertains to the expansion of cycle lanes, which is a separate initiative discussed in the text. It does not address how car-sharing schemes contribute to eco-friendly travel, thus making it an incorrect choice.
Option 4: "By expanding the city's cycle lanes"
Explanation: This option discusses the expansion of cycle lanes, which is unrelated to car-sharing schemes. It does not contribute to the understanding of how car-sharing promotes eco-friendly travel, making it an incorrect response.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation