According to the text, it is surmised that?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "HFC (hydrofluorocarbons) 134a is a more potent greenhouse gas than any other gases."
Explanation: The text explicitly states that HFC-134a is about 1,400 times more damaging to the climate system than carbon dioxide, which implies it is more potent than other greenhouse gases mentioned. This aligns with the main idea of the text regarding the potency of HFCs.
Option 1: "Carbon dioxide (Co2) is a more potent greenhouse gas than any other gases."
Explanation: The text states that HFC-134a is about 1,400 times more damaging to the climate system than carbon dioxide, indicating that carbon dioxide is not the most potent greenhouse gas. Therefore, this option contradicts the information presented in the text.
Option 2: "CFCs (chlorofluorocarbon) is a more potent greenhouse gas than any other gases."
Explanation: The text does not support this statement; it mentions that HFCs are substitutes for CFCs and that HFCs have a higher global warming potential than CFCs. Thus, this option is incorrect as it misrepresents the comparative potency of these gases.
Option 4: "Methane is a more potent greenhouse gas than any other gases."
Explanation: While methane is a potent greenhouse gas, the text does not claim it is the most potent. It focuses on HFC-134a's higher global warming potential compared to carbon dioxide and does not provide a comparison that supports this option.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation