Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Back to Questions
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #4380 Research
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
An understanding of data-gathering processes is not only essential for effective experimental design but also for the accurate interpretation of results. Researchers often encounter studies with contradictory findings and, in order to understand these discrepancies, it is important to examine the procedures followed prior to and during the study. When setting up an experiment, researchers make countless, seemingly minor decisions that can significantly affect their results. This is not to say that scientists deliberately manipulate their experiments, rather that there are numerous valid procedures for collecting and analysing data. Results can only be fully understood if the conditions under which they were obtained are also scrutinized.

What is the writer's main point in this paragraph about research?

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "Experimental methodology is extremely important."

Explanation: This option accurately reflects the main point of the text, which emphasizes the significance of understanding data-gathering processes and experimental design for interpreting results. The author argues that the methodology is crucial for valid outcomes, as indicated by phrases like 'essential for effective experimental design' and 'fully understood if the conditions...are scrutinized.'

Option 1: "Contradictory experimental results are a concern."

Explanation: While the text mentions contradictory findings, it does not state that they are a primary concern. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of understanding data-gathering processes to interpret results accurately.

Option 2: "Researchers often manipulate results through design."

Explanation: The text explicitly states that scientists do not deliberately manipulate their experiments. This option misrepresents the author's tone and intent, which is to highlight the complexity of experimental design rather than suggesting manipulation.

Option 3: "Scientists sometimes use unreliable methods."

Explanation: The text does not claim that scientists use unreliable methods. Instead, it discusses the validity of various procedures for data collection and analysis, indicating that the methods can be valid even if they lead to different results.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...