The hind leg of Basilosaurus was a significant find because it showed that Basilosaurus
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "could not have walked on land"
Explanation: The text states that the hind leg of Basilosaurus was too small to support its large body on land, indicating that it could not have walked on land. This directly supports the claim made in this option.
Option 1: "lived later than Ambulocetus natans"
Explanation: The text does not provide any information regarding the timeline of Basilosaurus in relation to Ambulocetus natans. Therefore, this option is not supported by the text.
Option 2: "lived at the same time as Pakicetus"
Explanation: Similar to Option 1, the text does not mention any temporal relationship between Basilosaurus and Pakicetus, making this option unsupported.
Option 3: "was able to swim well"
Explanation: While Basilosaurus is described as a fully marine whale, the text does not specifically state that the hind leg indicates swimming ability. Thus, this option lacks direct support from the text.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation