Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #45620 Insecticides
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
The assault on the purity of the environment is the price that we pay for many of the benefits of modern technology. For the advantage of automotive transportation, we pay a price in smog-induced diseases; for the powerful effects of new insecticides, we pay a price in dwindling wildlife and disturbances in the relation of living things and their surroundings; for nuclear power, we risk the biological hazards of radiation. By increasing agricultural production with fertilizers, we worsen the water population.
The highly developed nations of the world are not only the immediate beneficiaries of the good that technology can do, which are also the first victims of environmental diseases that technology breeds. In the past, the environmental effects which accompanied technological progress were restricted to a small and relatively short time. The new hazards neither local nor brief. Modern air pollution covers vast areas of continents: Radioactive fallout from the nuclear explosion is worldwide. Radioactive pollutants now on the earth's surface will be found there for generations, and in the case of Carbon-14, for thousands of years.

Insecticides:

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 2: "caused imbalance in the relationship between living beings and their environment"

Explanation: This option accurately reflects the text's assertion that the powerful effects of new insecticides disturb the relationship between living things and their surroundings. The phrase 'imbalance in the relationship' aligns with the text's discussion of how insecticides negatively impact ecosystems.

Option 1: "reduced the number of wild animals"

Explanation: While the text mentions that the use of insecticides leads to dwindling wildlife, it does not state that insecticides directly reduced the number of wild animals. This option oversimplifies the issue and does not capture the broader context of ecological imbalance.

Option 3: "eliminated diseases by killing mosquitoes and flies"

Explanation: This option presents a positive outcome of insecticides that is not supported by the text. The text focuses on the negative consequences of insecticides, such as ecological disturbances, rather than any benefits related to disease elimination.

Option 4: "caused biological hazards"

Explanation: Although the text discusses biological hazards in relation to nuclear power, it does not specifically attribute biological hazards to insecticides. This option is too broad and does not directly connect to the specific effects of insecticides mentioned in the text.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...