Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #45622 The enjoyment
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
The enjoyment of physical possession of things would seem to be one of the prerogatives of wealth which have been little impaired. Presumably, nothing has happened to keep the man who can afford them from enjoying his Rembrandt and his home-grown orchids. But the enjoyment of things has always been associated with the third prerogative of wealth which is the distinct it confers. In a world where nearly everyone was poor, the distinction was very great. It was the natural consequence of rarity. In England it is widely agreed, the ducal families are not uniformly superior. There is a roughly normal incidence of intelligence and stupidity, good taste and bad taste, morality, immorality. But very few people are dukes and duchesses, although the latter has become rather more frequent with the modern easing of divorce laws. As a result, even though they may be intrinsically unexceptional they are regarded with some awe. So it has long has been with the rich. Were dukes numerous their position would deteriorate? As the rich have become more numerous, they have inevitably become a debased currency.

The enjoyment of the physical possession of things

* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "is one of the privileges of wealth which has not been changed"

Explanation: The text states that the enjoyment of physical possessions is a prerogative of wealth that remains largely intact, indicating that it has not been significantly altered over time. This aligns with the main idea that wealth allows individuals to enjoy their possessions without hindrance.

Option 2: "is one of the privileges of wealth which should be curtailed"

Explanation: This option contradicts the text, which emphasizes that the enjoyment of possessions is a privilege of wealth that persists. The use of 'should be curtailed' implies a negative view that is not supported by the text.

Option 3: "has little to do with the prerogatives of wealth"

Explanation: This option misrepresents the text's message. The text clearly connects the enjoyment of physical possessions with the prerogatives of wealth, indicating that they are closely related, not separate.

Option 4: "is a prerogative of wealth which cannot be disputed"

Explanation: While the enjoyment of possessions is indeed a prerogative of wealth, the phrase 'cannot be disputed' suggests an absolute certainty that the text does not explicitly support. The text discusses the nuances of wealth and its perception, indicating that this statement is too strong.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...