The enjoyment of the physical possession of things
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "is one of the privileges of wealth which has not been changed"
Explanation: The text states that the enjoyment of physical possessions is a prerogative of wealth that remains largely intact, indicating that it has not been significantly altered over time. This aligns with the main idea that wealth allows individuals to enjoy their possessions without hindrance.
Option 2: "is one of the privileges of wealth which should be curtailed"
Explanation: This option contradicts the text, which emphasizes that the enjoyment of possessions is a privilege of wealth that persists. The use of 'should be curtailed' implies a negative view that is not supported by the text.
Option 3: "has little to do with the prerogatives of wealth"
Explanation: This option misrepresents the text's message. The text clearly connects the enjoyment of physical possessions with the prerogatives of wealth, indicating that they are closely related, not separate.
Option 4: "is a prerogative of wealth which cannot be disputed"
Explanation: While the enjoyment of possessions is indeed a prerogative of wealth, the phrase 'cannot be disputed' suggests an absolute certainty that the text does not explicitly support. The text discusses the nuances of wealth and its perception, indicating that this statement is too strong.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation