Everyone was issued with an identity card and each household had a ration book. Then they had to register with a local supplier of food whose name was stamped in the ration book so that you could only buy your ration from that supplier, and only the amount you were allowed. The books contained coupons which the shopkeepers cut out every time you made a purchase, and the amount you were allowed depended, to a certain extent, on the color of your ration book. The majority of adults had a buff or brownish book. Then there was the green book for pregnant women, nursing mothers and children under five, and this allowed them first choice of fruit, a daily pint of milk and a double supply of eggs. Children between the ages of 5 and 16 had a blue book, which allowed them fruit, a full meat ration and half a pint of milk a day.
The idea was to make as sure as possible that everybody got a fair share of the food available, the worry being that as food and other consumer goods became scarcer, prices would rise and the less well-off might not be able to pay. However, some thought it unfair, as people living in rural areas could get hold of eggs, butter and milk fairly easily without coupons.
According to the text, which of the following statements is true?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "Pregnant women were allowed twice as many eggs as other adults."
Explanation: The text clearly states that the green ration book for pregnant women, nursing mothers, and children under five allowed them first choice of fruit, a daily pint of milk, and a double supply of eggs. This directly supports the statement that pregnant women were allotted twice as many eggs as other adults, making it the correct answer.
Option 1: "Teenagers were allotted more milk than other age groups."
Explanation: The text specifies that children between the ages of 5 and 16 had a blue book, which allowed them half a pint of milk a day. This does not indicate that teenagers were allotted more milk than other age groups, as adults had different rations, and the statement is misleading.
Option 2: "People who lived in the country didn't have to pay for eggs and butter."
Explanation: The text mentions that people living in rural areas could obtain eggs, butter, and milk fairly easily without coupons, but it does not state that they didn't have to pay for these items. Therefore, this option misrepresents the information.
Option 3: "People had a healthier diet under rationing."
Explanation: While the text notes a general improvement in health standards during the rationing period, it does not explicitly state that people had a healthier diet. The improvement in health standards could be attributed to various factors, making this statement too broad and not directly supported by the text.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation