- You will watch a 2-minute video. Then 8 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: Whether to lobby the City of Hamilton for a new bus stop near Bold Street.
Why this is correct: The opening proposes asking the city for a new stop near Bold Street. The later discussion weighs evidence, resident feedback and the location of that bus stop.
Tips: Identify the proposal first, then separate concerns about it from the main topic.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Whether to build a community parking lot near Bold Street.: A parking lot is not proposed; packed buses motivate a new stop.
- Whether to start a neighbourhood carpool programme.: A carpool programme is not proposed; the request concerns bus service.
- Whether to petition for a new subway line in Hamilton.: The discussion is about a bus stop, not a new subway line.
Correct Answer: The last time they lobbied, council said ridership projections were too low.
Why this is correct: Caution comes from the earlier council response that ridership projections were too low to justify a new stop. A stronger data-based case is needed to avoid the same rejection and protect credibility.
Tips: For a why question, check each option against the reason the speaker actually gives.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The person on the left believes the City of Hamilton will reject any request.: Rejection of any request overstates the conditional concern.
- The person on the left is worried about the environmental impact of more buses.: Environmental harm is not raised.
- The person on the left thinks the neighbourhood does not need better transit.: Transit need is not denied.
Correct Answer: New condos have been approved under the city's zoning by-law, which may increase demand.
Why this is correct: New condos approved under the city's zoning by-law may have increased transit demand. The earlier projections used old density figures and are described as outdated.
Tips: Identify the neighbourhood change that makes the old demand projections less useful.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A new shopping centre has been built nearby.: A shopping centre is not reported.
- Many residents have started working from home.: Working from home is not reported.
- Several bus routes have been cancelled in the neighbourhood.: No one talks about canceling routes.
Correct Answer: The request must include updated ridership numbers.
Why this is correct: Support for a formal request is offered only if new numbers are added. The earlier low projections explain why better evidence matters.
Tips: Conditions often follow phrases like provided that.
Why the other options are wrong:
- All residents must sign a petition before the request is submitted.: All-resident signatures are not required.
- The neighbourhood must first raise funds to build the bus shelter.: Shelter fundraising is not required.
- The request must include a proposed bus schedule.: A proposed schedule is not required.
Correct Answer: They could miss the next service review.
Why this is correct: Waiting for HSR to update its own figures could mean missing the next service review. The risk is losing the next opportunity to make the request.
Tips: Identify the stated risk of waiting without adding an unmentioned frequency.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The city might build the stop in a different neighbourhood instead.: A competing neighbourhood is not mentioned.
- Bus fares are expected to increase next year.: Fare increases are not mentioned.
- The zoning by-law approval will expire soon.: Zoning expiry is not mentioned.
Correct Answer: It might cause noise and loitering.
Why this is correct: The discussion reports neighbours worrying about noise and loitering near a bus stop. Those are the two concerns stated, rather than the other effects in the options.
Tips: For a reported concern, listen for the specific effects named after the concern phrase.
Why the other options are wrong:
- It might reduce property values in the area.: Property values are not the reported concern; noise and loitering are.
- It might attract tourists to the neighbourhood.: Tourists are not mentioned as the concern; nearby residents worry about disturbance.
- It might block traffic on Bold Street.: Blocking Bold Street traffic is not the reported concern.
Correct Answer: Closer to Main Street, not directly on Bold Street.
Why this is correct: The preferred location is closer to Main Street rather than directly on Bold. This is offered while acknowledging neighbours' concerns about noise and loitering.
Tips: Match the preferred location to the concern it is intended to address.
Why the other options are wrong:
- In front of the community centre.: A community-centre location is not preferred.
- At the intersection of Bold Street and King Street.: Bold/King intersection is not preferred.
- Near the new condominium buildings.: A condo-adjacent location is not preferred.
Correct Answer: Consult residents and gather updated ridership data before lobbying for the stop.
Why this is correct: Updated ridership figures and resident consultation are proposed before lobbying. The aim is to make a stronger request while acknowledging neighbourhood concerns. This shows support with consultation.
Tips: Distinguish preparation for lobbying from immediately submitting a request.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They will contact the HSR directly to request a meeting.: No HSR meeting is proposed as the preparation.
- They will organize a public meeting to discuss the bus stop proposal.: Consultation is proposed, but a public meeting format is not specified.
- They will submit a formal lobbying letter to the city council immediately.: Immediate formal-letter submission skips the proposed preparation.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation