- You will watch a 2-minute video. Then 8 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: Whether to expand services into Calgary's northeast or consolidate existing programmes.
Why this is correct: The summary contrasts expanding into Calgary’s northeast with strengthening the services already run in the city centre. This sentence clearly shows the main issue is choosing between expansion and consolidation.
Tips: For main issue questions, listen closely to the first speaker.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Whether to merge the Calgary Outreach Collective with another organization.: Sharing space with a community centre is suggested to manage expansion costs; merging with another organization is not proposed.
- Whether to reduce the number of programmes offered downtown.: Tightening up existing programmes is an alternative to expansion. The dialogue does not state that the main decision is to reduce the number of downtown programmes.
- Whether to relocate the organization's headquarters.: No one talks about moving the office. They discuss services, not office location.
Correct Answer: A needs assessment shows a real gap in newcomer supports, especially employment coaching, in the northeast.
Why this is correct: The expansion supporter talks about needs and partnerships, not risks. The person on the left cites a needs assessment showing a gap in employment coaching in the northeast.
Tips: Follow the scope of the question and distinguish the stated point from other suggestions.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The person on the left wants to compete with other outreach organizations in the city.: Competition with other organizations is not the reason.
- The person on the left thinks the organization has too much funding and needs to spend it.: Excess funding is not reported.
- The person on the left believes the downtown programmes are no longer needed.: Downtown services are still needed, not dismissed.
Correct Answer: Provincial funding cuts have reduced the operating budget.
Why this is correct: The person in the centre says provincial cuts have removed part of the operating budget, making new long-term commitments risky.
Tips: Follow the scope of the question and distinguish the stated point from other suggestions.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The person in the centre believes expanding would require relocating existing staff.: Relocating current staff is not the person in the centre's stated objection.
- The person in the centre thinks the northeast already has enough services.: The needs assessment identifies a service gap, not adequate existing provision.
- The person in the centre is concerned about competition from other nonprofits.: Competition is not the person in the centre's stated concern.
Correct Answer: Opening a new site means long-term leases and hiring, which worries the person in the centre.
Why this is correct: The person in the centre links a new site to hiring, long-term leases and a multi-year financial commitment, even with city grants.
Tips: Follow the scope of the question and distinguish the stated point from other suggestions.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The person in the centre wants to hire only volunteers to save on staffing costs.: An all-volunteer workforce is not proposed.
- The person in the centre thinks the rent in the northeast is too expensive.: The person in the centre stresses a long-term commitment, not a stated comparison showing northeast rents are too expensive.
- The person in the centre believes the City of Calgary should provide office space for free.: Free city office space is not requested.
Correct Answer: The person on the left suggests partnering with a community centre, as they did in the south.
Why this is correct: The person on the left proposes partnering with a community centre, following the successful shared-space arrangement used in the south.
Tips: Follow the scope of the question and distinguish the stated point from other suggestions.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The person on the left suggests charging fees for newcomer services.: Charging newcomer fees is not proposed.
- The person on the left suggests running the new site entirely with volunteers.: An entirely volunteer-run site is not suggested.
- The person on the left suggests applying for federal grants.: Federal grants are not the cost-management suggestion.
Correct Answer: Spreading resources too thin could harm the downtown programmes and their users.
Why this is correct: The person in the centre warns that expansion could weaken existing programmes and hurt people already depending on downtown services.
Tips: Link hesitations to the reasons given right after.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The organization would have to construct a new community centre immediately.: The person in the centre identifies resources being spread too thin, not an immediate construction obligation.
- The organization would have to repay its existing provincial grants.: Repayment of existing grants is not reported.
- Downtown users would have to pay higher fees for current programmes.: Higher user fees are not the risk the person in the centre identifies.
Correct Answer: Housing is more affordable there.
Why this is correct: The person on the left says people are settling in the northeast because housing is more affordable, although nearby programme access is missing.
Tips: Follow the scope of the question and distinguish the stated point from other suggestions.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Most employment opportunities are located there.: The person on the left gives affordable housing as the settlement reason, not the location of most jobs.
- It is closer to the existing downtown programmes.: Proximity to downtown programmes is not the reason stated.
- Rental assistance is available only in that neighbourhood.: Affordable housing does not establish an exclusive rental-assistance programme.
Correct Answer: A phased approach rather than leasing a separate building for a full immediate rollout.
Why this is correct: The person on the right summarizes the person on the left's shared-space suggestion as a phased approach, and the person on the left confirms it after rejecting an immediate full rollout.
Tips: Follow the scope of the question and distinguish the stated point from other suggestions.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They will consolidate all programmes into one downtown location.: Consolidation at one downtown site is not confirmed.
- They will hire a consultant to conduct a feasibility study.: A consultant study is not agreed.
- They will proceed with full expansion into the northeast immediately.: They say no full expansion yet. The person on the left confirms a phased approach rather than an immediate full rollout.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation