Green Transport
A. Society has tended to be shaped by its modes of transport, from the horse and cart to the car and the plane. Now, though, our world and its transport systems are being shaped by the threat from climate change. In the UK, transport alone accounts for around a quarter of greenhouse-gas emissions, so the big question is how we can make it green.
B. This challenge has become more pressing since the government released its white paper on energy and climate change in July. With slashing emissions by 80 per cent by 2050 now an official target, the spotlight of transport research has shifted from miles per hour on to miles per gallon, says Roger Kemp, professor of engineering at Lancaster University. This shift has been helped by the white paper's emphasize on green transport, and boosted by its prediction that an estimated 1.2 million extra green energy jobs will be created by 2020. "Green energy for transportation is a huge marketplace," says Barry Potier from Resourcing Solutions, a recruitment consultancy based in Ruscombe, Berkshire, that specialises in renewable energy.
C. To sustain this marketplace, the UK will need a strong base in terms of expertise. Combine this with the fact that there is a real shortfall in people with the technical skills required, says Potier, and those who have the qualifications can have their pick of the jobs. "Energy should be the career of choice for all scientists, technicians and engineers at the moment - it's a no-brainer," adds Kemp.
D. So where should you begin? In such a broad industry the options can be overwhelming, so focus on getting a grounding in an applied science or engineering, advises Tristan Smith, a mechanical engineering research assistant at University College London. "Employers are looking for excellent knowledge of first principles, rather than someone who can just 'talk the talk' ". It doesn't necessarily pay to start with the greenest companies either. Large engineering firms, such as Rolls-Royce or BAE Systems, might not be the poster boys of sustainable development at the moment, says Smith, but they do have the funding and graduate training schemes to give you the best start.
E. All transport methods will be affected by the government's target, with the Royal Society saying that "radical" changes in how we travel and the way we fuel our vehicles will be needed. So which area should you specialise in? Road transport is ahead of the game, having received some of the biggest investments for green projects. Steven Chu, the US Secretary of Energy, has stated his belief in the "inevitable transition to electricity as the energy for our personal transportation". Even Google is investing in green cars, bankrolling the futuristic Aptera - which not only looks good, but runs off electricity too.
F. Yet despite this support there is still a long way to go. "Your electric car is only as green as your electricity supply," says Jeff Hardy, from the UK Energy Research Centre in London. One of the biggest challenges will be to make sure the electricity we use to charge our cars is low-carbon. What's more, we will need a whole new infrastructure to charge them - think exchanging your battery when you stop at a service station rather than filling the tank. This infrastructure just doesn't exist yet. Then there is all the energy needed to run the new system: "Switching 23 million cars to electric, that requires quite a large extra chunk of electricity that we don't currently produce," says Hardy. According to Smith, these challenges are no bad thing. "If we are going to meet any of our CO2 reduction targets, there's so much for engineers to get stuck into. For anyone who enjoys a challenge, this is the most exciting time since the industrial revolution."
G. While electricity for cars is seen as a winning investment, biofuels are more contentious. A recent study by the European Commission predicts that, of all the renewables, biofuels will offer the most career opportunities in the future. Yet confidence in this energy source is far from universal, as producing biofuel would involve encroaching on agricultural land. Even if you could power all cars with it, no one would be able to eat, argues Kemp. Despite these doubts, there is cash available for research. This year the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council invested £27 million in biofuels by launching the Sustainable Bioenergy Centre, a partnership between academia and industry. There is still hope for biofuels, says Hardy, because there is a lot of interest in what comes next - second and third-generation technologies which move us away from crops as a fuel source and towards using agricultural waste, for instance.
H. Using fuel cells to power vehicles is another exciting and hotly debated prospect. "A fuel cell gives us the highest efficiency device for producing electricity that we know of. It produces very low emissions too, so it's efficient and it's clean," says Nigel Brandon, director of the Energy Futures Lab at Imperial College London. Nevertheless, issues such as refuelling and ensuring the energy comes from renewable sources are proving problematic, as is the fact that fuel cells are still expensive to produce. "We need to work to make those fuel cells cheaper, and to do so we need to develop new materials," says Brandon. All these obstacles stand between fuel-cell cars and the mass market. So is it a career dead end for young scientists? Not according to Brandon. "We absolutely have to address our emissions from the transport sector and there are very few ways we can do it," he says. "For young scientists and engineers in the years ahead there are tremendous opportunities to make a contribution. The challenges are there and fuel cells are part of the solution."
| A | B | C | D | E | F | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | thinks that job-hunters face an easy decision | ||||||
| 2 | thinks that job-hunters need a sound understanding of the basic concepts | ||||||
| 3 | is quite optimistic about biofuels | ||||||
| 4 | believes there are great opportunities for job-hunters in fuel cell technology | ||||||
| 5 | welcomes the problems of moving to electric cars |
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Question Focus: Synonym match - 'easy decision' = 'it's a no-brainer'
Why this is correct: The answer is Roger Kemp because he clearly says choosing this career is easy. When he says "it's a no-brainer", he means job-hunters do not need to think hard about the decision.
Passage Reference: Energy should be the career of choice for all scientists, technicians and engineers at the moment - it's a no-brainer," adds Kemp. D.
Common Mistake: Students sometimes choose Barry Potier because he talks about many jobs. That is a Partial truth trap - he describes opportunities, but he does not say the decision is easy.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'it's a no-brainer' = Statement: 'an easy decision'
Tips: When a statement is about attitude or opinion, look for strong personal comments in quotation marks.
Key Vocabulary:
- no-brainer = very easy decision
- career of choice = best job option
Question Focus: Synonym match - 'basic concepts' = 'first principles'
Passage Reference: Employers are looking for excellent knowledge of first principles, rather than someone who can just 'talk the talk' ".
Why this is correct: The answer is Tristan Smith because he says employers want excellent knowledge of first principles. This clearly matches the idea of understanding the basic concepts.
Common Mistake: Some students choose Roger Kemp because he talks about scientists and engineers. This is a Context shift trap - Kemp talks about careers generally, not about basic knowledge.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'first principles' = Statement: 'basic concepts'
Tips: In matching features, focus on who says what - scan for names first, then read the sentence carefully.
Key Vocabulary:
- first principles = basic ideas
- grounding = strong foundation
Question Focus: Attitude match - optimism shown despite problems
Passage Reference: There is still hope for biofuels, says Hardy, because there is a lot of interest in what comes next - second and third-generation technologies which move us away from crops as a fuel source and towards using agricultural waste, for instance. H.
Why this is correct: The answer is Jeff Hardy because he says there is still hope for biofuels. Even though there are doubts, this sentence clearly shows optimism.
Common Mistake: Students often choose Roger Kemp because he criticises biofuels. That is a Contradiction trap - Kemp is negative, not optimistic.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'there is still hope' = Statement: 'quite optimistic'
Tips: Words like 'hope', 'opportunity', or 'optimistic' show attitude - match them carefully.
Key Vocabulary:
- contentious = controversial
- encroaching = taking over
Question Focus: Synonym match - 'great opportunities' = 'tremendous opportunities'
Passage Reference: for young scientists? Not according to Brandon. "We absolutely have to address our emissions from the transport sector and there are very few ways we can do it," he says. "For young scientists and engineers in the years ahead there are tremendous opportunities to make a contribution. The challenges are there and fuel cells are part of the solution.
Why this is correct: The answer is Nigel Brandon because he directly says there are tremendous opportunities for young scientists and engineers. He is clearly positive about careers in fuel cell technology.
Common Mistake: Some students choose Steven Chu because he talks about future transport. This is a Wrong section trap - Chu talks about electric cars, not fuel cells.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'tremendous opportunities' = Statement: 'great opportunities'
Tips: When technology is named in the statement, match it exactly with the same technology in the passage.
Key Vocabulary:
- tremendous = very great
- mass market = large public market
Question Focus: Attitude match - seeing problems as positive
Passage Reference: According to Smith, these challenges are no bad thing. "If we are going to meet any of our CO2 reduction targets, there's so much for engineers to get stuck into. For anyone who enjoys a challenge, this is the most exciting time since the industrial revolution." G.
Why this is correct: The answer is Tristan Smith because he says these challenges are no bad thing. This shows he actually welcomes the problems involved in switching to electric cars.
Common Mistake: Students sometimes choose Jeff Hardy because he lists many problems. This is a Reverse meaning trap - Hardy describes difficulties, but Smith is the one who welcomes them.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'challenges are no bad thing' = Statement: 'welcomes the problems'
Tips: Do not confuse describing problems with liking them - check the speaker's opinion.
Key Vocabulary:
- challenge = difficult problem
- get stuck into = work on enthusiastically
General Tips:
- Matching Features questions can jump around the passage - do not assume answers follow paragraph order.
- Scan for names first, then read the sentences around them carefully.
- Focus on opinions and attitudes like optimism, doubt, or enthusiasm.
- Options can be used more than once - do not cross them off too early.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation