The reading passage has ten paragraphs A-J.
Which paragraph contains the following information?
Multitasking Debate
Can you do them at the same time?
A. Talking on the phone while driving isn’t the only situation where we’re worse at multitasking than we might like to think we are. New studies have identified a bottleneck in our brains that some say means we are fundamentally incapable of true multitasking. If experimental findings reflect real-world performance, people who think they are multitasking are probably just underperforming in all – or at best, all but one – of their parallel pursuits. Practice might improve your performance, but you will never be as good as when focusing on one task at a time.
B. The problem, according to Rene Marois, a psychologist at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, is that there’s a sticking point in the brain. To demonstrate this, Marois devised an experiment to locate it. Volunteers watch a screen and when a particular image appears, a red circle, say, they have to press a key with their index finger. Different coloured circles require presses from different fingers. Typical response time is about half a second, and the volunteers quickly reach their peak performance. Then they learn to listen to different recordings and respond by making a specific sound. For instance, when they hear a bird chirp, they have to say “ba”; an electronic sound should elicit a “ko”, and so on. Again, no problem. A normal person can do that in about half a second, with almost no effort.
C. The trouble comes when Marois shows the volunteers an image and then almost immediately plays them a sound. Now they’re flummoxed. “If you show an image and play a sound at the same time, one task is postponed”, he says. In fact, if the second task is introduced within the half-second or so it takes to process and react to the first, it will simply be delayed until the first one is done. The largest dual-task delays occur when the two tasks are presented simultaneously; delays progressively shorten as the interval between presenting the tasks lengthens.
D. There are at least three points where we seem to get stuck, says Marois. The first is simply identifying what we’re looking at. This can take a few tenths of a second, during which time we are not able to see and recognise the second item. This limitation is known as the “attentional blink”: experiments have shown that if you’re watching out for a particular event and a second one shows up unexpectedly any time within this crucial window of concentration, it may register in your visual cortex, but you will be unable to act upon it. Interestingly, if you don’t expect the first event, you have no trouble responding to the second. What exactly causes the attentional blink is still a matter for debate.
E. A second limitation is in our short-term visual memory. It’s estimated that we can keep track of about four items at a time, fewer if they are complex. This capacity shortage is thought to explain, in part, our astonishing inability to detect even huge changes in scenes that are otherwise identical, so-called “change blindness”. Show people pairs of near-identical photos – say, aircraft engines in one picture have disappeared in the other – and they will fail to spot the differences. Here again, though, there is disagreement about what the essential limiting factor really is. Does it come down to a dearth of storage capacity, or is it about how much attention a viewer is paying?
F. A third limitation is that choosing a response to a stimulus – breaking when you see a child in the road, for instance, or replying when your mother tells you over the phone that she’s thinking of leaving your dad – also takes brainpower. Selecting a response to one of these things will delay by some tenths of a second your ability to respond to the other. This is called the “response selection bottleneck” theory, first proposed in 1952.
G. But David Meyer, a psychologist at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, doesn’t buy the bottleneck idea. He thinks dual-task interference is just evidence of a strategy used by the brain to prioritise multiple activities. Meyer is known as something of an optimist by his peers. He has written papers with titles like “Virtually perfect time-sharing in dualtask performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck”. His experiments have shown that with enough practice – at least 2000 tries – some people can execute two tasks simultaneously as competently as if they were doing them one after the other. He suggests that there is a central cognitive processor that coordinates all this and, what’s more, he thinks it uses discretion sometimes; it chooses to delay one task while completing another.
H. Marois agrees that practice can sometimes erase interference effects. He has found that with just 1 hour of practice each day for two weeks, volunteers show a huge improvement at managing both his tasks at once. Where he disagrees with Meyer is in what the brain is doing to achieve this. Marois speculates that practice might give us the chance to find less congested circuits to execute a task – rather like finding trusty back streets to avoid heavy traffic on main roads – effectively making our response to the task subconscious. After all, there are plenty of examples of subconscious multitasking that most of us routinely manage: walking and talking, eating and reading, watching TV and folding the laundry.
I. It probably comes as no surprise that, generally speaking, we get worse at multitasking as we age. According to Art Kramer at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, who studies how ageing affects our cognitive abilities, we peak in our 20s. Though the decline is slow through our 30s and on into our 50s, it is there; and after 55, it becomes more precipitous. In one study, he and his colleagues had both young and old participants do a simulated driving task while carrying on a conversation. He found that while young drivers tended to miss background changes, older drivers failed to notice things that were highly relevant. Likewise, older subjects had more trouble paying attention to the more important parts of a scene than young drivers.
J. It’s not all bad news for over-55s, though. Kramer also found that older people can benefit from practice. Not only did they learn to perform better, but brain scans also showed that underlying that improvement was a change in the way their brains become active. While it’s clear that practice can often make a difference, especially as we age, the basic facts remain sobering. “We have this impression of an almighty complex brain,” says Marois, “and yet we have very humbling and crippling limits.” For most of our history, we probably never needed to do more than one thing at a time, he says, and so we haven’t evolved to be able to. Perhaps we will in future, though. We might yet look back one day on people like Debbie and Alun as ancestors of a new breed of the true multitasker.
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A theory explained delay happens when selecting one reaction | ||||||||||
| 2 | Different age group responds to important things differently | ||||||||||
| 3 | Conflicts happened when visual and audio element emerge simultaneously | ||||||||||
| 4 | An experiment designed to demonstrates the critical part in the brain for multitasking | ||||||||||
| 5 | An viewpoint favours the optimistic side of multitask performance |
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Question Focus: Response selection bottleneck - delay caused by choosing a response
Why this is correct: The answer is Paragraph F because it clearly explains that choosing a response itself takes brainpower and causes a delay. It even names this idea as the response selection bottleneck theory, which exactly matches the statement.
Passage Reference: A third limitation is that choosing a response to a stimulus - breaking when you see a child in the road, for instance, or replying when your mother tells you over the phone that she's thinking of leaving your dad - also takes brainpower. Selecting a response to one of these things will delay by some tenths of a second your ability to respond to the other. This is called the 'response selection bottleneck' theory, first proposed in 1952.
Common Mistake: Students sometimes choose Paragraph C because it also talks about delay. This is a Context shift trap - Paragraph C is about tasks arriving together, not about delay caused by selecting a reaction.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'choosing a response ... will delay' = Statement: 'delay happens when selecting one reaction'
Tips: Look for theory names. When a statement mentions a theory, scan for paragraphs that define or name a theory.
Key Vocabulary:
- stimulus = something that causes a reaction
- bottleneck = a narrow point that slows things down
Question Focus: Age comparison - younger vs older responses to important information
Passage Reference: . It probably comes as no surprise that, generally speaking, we get worse at multitasking as we age. According to Art Kramer at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, who studies how ageing affects our cognitive abilities, we peak in our 20s. Though the decline is slow through our 30s and on into our 50s, it is there; and after 55, it becomes more precipitous. In one study, he and his colleagues had both young and old participants do a simulated driving task while carrying on a conversation. He found that while young drivers tended to miss background changes, older drivers failed to notice things that were highly relevant. Likewise, older subjects had more trouble paying attention to the more important parts of a scene than young drivers.
Why this is correct: The answer is Paragraph I because it compares young and old participants and explains how older drivers failed to notice important things. This directly matches the idea of different age groups responding differently to important information.
Common Mistake: Some students choose Paragraph J because it also talks about older people. This is a Wrong section trap - Paragraph J focuses on practice benefits, not differences in response to important things.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'older drivers failed to notice things that were highly relevant' = Statement: 'responds to important things differently'
Tips: When you see age words like older, young, or age, scan for comparison language.
Key Vocabulary:
- relevant = important
- participants = people in a study
Question Focus: Visual and audio tasks presented at the same time causing conflict
Passage Reference: The trouble comes when Marois shows the volunteers an image and then almost immediately plays them a sound. Now they're flummoxed. 'If you show an image and play a sound at the same time, one task is postponed', he says. In fact, if the second task is introduced within the half-second or so it takes to process and react to the first, it will simply be delayed until the first one is done.
Why this is correct: The answer is Paragraph C because it describes what happens when an image and a sound appear at the same time. The passage says one task is postponed, which shows a clear conflict between visual and audio tasks.
Common Mistake: Students sometimes choose Paragraph B because it mentions images and sounds. This is a Partial truth trap - Paragraph B describes separate tasks, not conflict when they happen together.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'image and play a sound at the same time' = Statement: 'visual and audio element emerge simultaneously'
Tips: For conflict or problem questions, scan for words like trouble, delay, or postponed.
Key Vocabulary:
- postponed = delayed
- simultaneously = at the same time
Question Focus: Experiment created to find the brain bottleneck
Passage Reference: The problem, according to Rene Marois, a psychologist at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, is that there's a sticking point in the brain. To demonstrate this, Marois devised an experiment to locate it. Volunteers watch a screen and when a particular image appears, a red circle, say, they have to press a key with their index finger. Different coloured circles require presses from different fingers. Typical response time is about half a second, and the volunteers quickly reach their peak performance. Then they learn to listen to different recordings and respond by making a specific sound. For instance, when they hear a bird chirp, they have to say 'ba'; an electronic sound should elicit a 'ko', and so on. Again, no problem. A normal person can do that in about half a second, with almost no effort.
Why this is correct: The answer is Paragraph B because it explains that Marois devised an experiment to locate the brain's sticking point. This clearly shows an experiment designed to find the critical part involved in multitasking.
Common Mistake: Some students choose Paragraph D because it explains brain limitations. This is a Wrong section trap - Paragraph D explains types of limits, not the experiment design.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'devised an experiment to locate it' = Statement: 'experiment designed to demonstrate the critical part in the brain'
Tips: If a statement mentions an experiment, scan for verbs like devised, tested, or studied.
Key Vocabulary:
- devise = create
- critical = very important
Question Focus: Optimistic opinion about multitasking ability
Passage Reference: But David Meyer, a psychologist at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, doesn't buy the bottleneck idea. He thinks dual-task interference is just evidence of a strategy used by the brain to prioritise multiple activities. Meyer is known as something of an optimist by his peers. He has written papers with titles like 'Virtually perfect time-sharing in dualtask performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck'. His experiments have shown that with enough practice - at least 2000 tries - some people can execute two tasks simultaneously as competently as if they were doing them one after the other. He suggests that there is a central cognitive processor that coordinates all this and, what's more, he thinks it uses discretion sometimes; it chooses to delay one task while completing another.
Why this is correct: The answer is Paragraph G because David Meyer is described as an optimist and believes people can execute two tasks simultaneously with practice. This clearly shows an optimistic view of multitasking performance.
Common Mistake: Students sometimes choose Paragraph H because it mentions improvement. This is a Context shift trap - Paragraph H explains Marois's view, not the optimistic viewpoint itself.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'something of an optimist' = Statement: 'favours the optimistic side'
Tips: Watch for attitude words like optimistic or skeptical. They often signal opinion paragraphs.
Key Vocabulary:
- optimist = someone who believes things can improve
- execute = perform
General Tips:
- Matching Features questions can jump around the passage - do not assume paragraph order.
- Scan for names like Marois, Meyer, or Kramer to quickly locate the right paragraph.
- Focus on meaning, not repeated words. IELTS often paraphrases heavily.
- Use key nouns in the statement like theory, experiment, or age to guide your scan.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation