The pursuit of Happiness
Compared with misery, happiness is relatively unexplored terrain for social scientists. Between 1967 and 1994, 46,380 articles indexed in Psychological Abstracts mentioned depression, 36,851 anxiety, and 5,099 anger. Only 2,389 spoke of happiness, 2,340 life satisfaction, and 405 joy.
Recently we and other researchers have begun a systematic study of happiness. During the past two decades, dozens of investigators throughout the world have asked several hundred thousand representatively sampled people to reflect on their happiness and satisfaction with life - or what psychologists call 'subjective well-being*. In the US the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago has surveyed a representative sample of roughly 1,500 people a year since 1957; the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan has carried out similar studies on a less regular basis, as has the Gallup Organization. Government-funded efforts have also probed the moods of European countries.
We have uncovered some surprising findings. People are happier than one might expect, and happiness does not appear to depend significantly on external circumstances. Although viewing life as a tragedy has a long and honorable history, the responses of random samples of people around the world about their happiness paints a much rosier picture. In the University of Chicago surveys, three in 10 Americans say they are very happy, for example. Only one in 10 chooses the most negative description 'not too happy”. The majority describe themselves as "pretty happy", ...
How can social scientists measure something as hard to pin down as happiness? Most researchers simply ask people to report their feelings of happiness or unhappiness and to assess how satisfying their lives are. Such self-reported well-being is moderately consistent over years of retesting. Furthermore, those who say they are happy and satisfied seem happy to their close friends and family members and to a psychologist-interviewer. Their daily mood ratings reveal more positive emotions, and they smile more than those who call themselves unhappy. Self-reported happiness also predicts other indicators of well-being. Compared with the depressed, happy people are less self-focused, less hostile and abusive, and less susceptible to disease.
We have found that the even distribution of happiness cuts across almost all demographic classifications of age, economic class, race and educational level. In addition, almost all strategies for assessing subjective well-being - including those that sample people's experience by polling them at random times with beepers - turn up similar findings.
Interviews with representative samples of people of all ages, for example, reveal that no time of life is notably happier or unhappier. Similarly, men and women are equally likely to declare themselves "very happy" and "satisfied" with life, according to a statistical digest of 146 studies by Marilyn J, Haring, William Stock and Moms A, Okun, all then at Arizona State University.
Wealth is also a poor predictor of happiness. People have not become happier over time as their cultures have become more affluent. Even though Americans earn twice as much in today's dollars as they did in 1957, the proportion of those telling surveyors from the National Opinion Research Center that they are "very happy" has declined from 35 to 29 percent.
Even very rich people - those surveyed among Forbes magazine's 100 wealthiest Americans - are only slightly happier than the average American. Those whose income has increased over a 10-year period are not happier than those whose income is stagnant. Indeed, in most nations the correlation between income and happiness is negligible - only in the poorest countries, such as Bangladesh and India, is income a good measure of emotional wellbeing.
Are people in rich countries happier, by and large, than people in not so rich countries? It appears in general that they are, but the margin may be slim. In Portugal, for example, only one in 10 people reports being very happy, whereas in the much more prosperous Netherlands the proportion of very happy is four in 10. Yet there are curious reversals in this correlation between national wealth and well-being -the Irish during the 1980s consistently reported greater life satisfaction than the wealthier West Germans. Furthermore, other factors, such as civil rights, literacy and duration of democratic government, al of which also promote reported life satisfaction, tend to go hand in hand with national wealth, As a result, it is impossible to tell whether the happiness of people in wealthier nations is based on money or is a by-product of other felicities.
Although happiness is not easy to predict from material circumstances, it seems consistent for those who have it, In one National Institute on Aging study of 5,000 adults, the happiest people in 1973 were still relatively happy a decade later, despite changes in work, residence and family status.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Question Focus: Main idea question - asks what point the writers make at the start
Correct Answer: C
Why this is correct: This is correct because the writers clearly show that very few studies focus on happiness compared with negative emotions. The numbers are used to prove that happiness is not well researched.
Passage Reference: Compared with misery, happiness is relatively unexplored terrain for social scientists. Between 1967 and 1994, 46,380 articles indexed in Psychological Abstracts mentioned depression... Only 2,389 spoke of happiness, 2,340 life satisfaction, and 405 joy.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'relatively unexplored terrain' = Option: 'not a well-documented research area'
Tips: When a question asks about the opening paragraph, focus on what the numbers or examples are proving overall, not small details.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Students may choose this because the paragraph mentions dates like 1967 and 1994. However, it talks about number of articles, not changes in happiness levels. This is a context shift trap.
- B: You might think this because journals are mentioned, but the passage does not say journals are biased. It only shows how many articles exist. This is a Not Given trap.
- D: This sounds logical because negative emotions are discussed, but the paragraph is about research focus, not how people think about themselves. This is a wrong section trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- terrain = area or field
- indexed = officially listed
Question Focus: Detail question - asks what the writers say about their findings
Correct Answer: D
Passage Reference: We have uncovered some surprising findings. People are happier than one might expect, and happiness does not appear to depend significantly on external circumstances.
Why this is correct: This is correct because the writers say the results were surprising and that people are happier than expected. This directly matches the idea that happiness levels are higher than they believed.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'happier than one might expect' = Option: 'higher than they had believed'
Tips: Words like 'surprising' often signal that results were different from expectations. Look for these attitude clues.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Students may pick this because the writers sound confident. However, they say the findings were surprising, not predicted. This is a contradiction trap.
- B: This may seem possible because the research relies on self-reports, but the writers never say people were dishonest. This is a Not Given trap.
- C: Other researchers are mentioned, but there is no claim of disagreement. In fact, the writers say others are also studying happiness. This is a Paraphrase trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- uncovered = discovered
- external circumstances = outside conditions
Question Focus: Detail question - asks what we learn about the research method
Correct Answer: B
Passage Reference: Such self-reported well-being is moderately consistent over years of retesting. Furthermore, those who say they are happy and satisfied seem happy to their close friends and family members...
Why this is correct: This is correct because the writers explain that results stay similar over time and are confirmed by other observations. This shows the method appears reliable.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'consistent over years of retesting' = Option: 'appears to be reliable'
Tips: When a question asks about method quality, look for words like 'consistent', 'predicts', or 'confirmed'.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Students may choose this because methods are explained in detail, but the passage never says the method is new. This is a Not Given trap.
- C: Beepers are mentioned later, but the writers say both methods give similar results, not that one is better. This is a Contradiction trap.
- D: The research supports accuracy, not extra information beyond happiness levels. This is a Partial truth trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- consistent = stable
- retesting = testing again
General Tips:
- MCQ questions follow passage order, so use the location of the last answer to find the next one faster.
- For main idea questions, ask yourself what the examples or statistics are trying to prove.
- Do not choose answers that sound true in real life unless the passage clearly supports them.
- Watch out for Not Given traps where the topic is mentioned but the claim is not made.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation