Separate, But EQ
Bad news for readers of this magazine: it's not enough to be smart anymore. That’s the sobering message from the folks behind the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory, which is being billed as the world’s first commercially available test for measuring “emotional intelligence.” Israeli psychologist Reuven Bar-On, who according to promotional materials has spent more than 16 years honing the EQ test, defines emotional intelligence as “capabilities, competencies, and skills that influence one’s ability to succeed in coping with environmental demands and pressures and directly affect one’s overall psychological well-being.” ,
In the early 1960s, examiners would give three-year-olds a marshmallow. The children were told that if they could hold off eating it until the examiner returned from some nonexistent errand, they would get a second marshmallow. Only about 15 per cent of the kids withstood the marshmallow temptation, with the other 85 per cent becoming the people who lean over the tracks to see if a train is coming. This test of “impulse control”, one of Bar-On’s components of emotional intelligence, turned out to be the single most important indicator for how well those kids adapted in terms of number of friends and performance in school, according to Stein.
The Bar-On test itself consists of neither chocolate nor marshmallows, and unlike some psychological exams, it's not designed to uncover nuts. Bar-On and Stein see the test as a tool to create emotional profiles, which can be used to match people to suitable careers or to identify and improve weak areas. The test lists 152 statements, including "I like everyone I meet” and "I do very weird things", which subjects judge themselves to agree or disagree with on a five-point scale. The statements cover five areas: intrapersonal, interpersonal, adaptability, stress management and general mood. Those areas can then be further broken down. For example, general mood consists of optimism and happiness. (Yours truly scored a full 20 points higher in happiness than in optimism. I'm still pretty happy, but I doubt it will last).
In developing the test, Bar-On administered it to more than 9,000 subjects in nine countries. The large pool includes enough journalists for a comparison between purveyors of print versus broadcast news. “We found that people in the electronic media tend to be more optimistic than those in the print media," Stein said. That difference can be easily explained. A few years back, this writer covered an auction of vintage Rolls-Royces and Bentleys for another publication. A prominent television journalist, who is safer left unidentified, also showed up. My optimism took a permanent hit that day, for whereas I was scrambling for a story, he came to shop. Although he might have a strong faith in the future, my broadcast brother could afford to be more lenient with his impulse control: if he opted to eat his marshmallow, he could always afford another Bentley-load.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Question Focus: Detail question - asks what the passage states about availability of the EQ test
Correct Answer: D
Why this is correct: This is correct because the passage clearly says the EQ test is commercially available, which means people can pay to take it.
Passage Reference: That's the sobering message from the folks behind the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory, which is being billed as the world's first commercially available test for measuring 'emotional intelligence.' Israeli psychologist Reuven Bar-On, who according to promotional materials has spent more than 16 years honing the EQ test, defines emotional intelligence as 'capabilities, competencies, and skills that influence one's ability to succeed in coping with environmental demands and pressures and directly affect one's overall psychological well-being.'
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'commercially available test' = Option: 'available to paying individuals'
Tips: When you see words like commercially, think about money and payment.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Students may choose this because psychologists are often linked to charities. However, the passage never mentions a non-profit organization. This is a Not Given trap.
- B: Students may notice the word psychological, but the passage says the test is not designed to uncover nuts, meaning it is not for identifying mental illness. This is a Contradiction trap.
- C: The passage says emotional intelligence can affect psychological well-being, not that the test itself influences mental health. This changes cause and effect. This is a Causation trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- commercially available = sold to the public
- psychological well-being = mental health
Question Focus: Detail question - asks what the marshmallow test showed
Correct Answer: A
Passage Reference: Only about 15 per cent of the kids withstood the marshmallow temptation, with the other 85 per cent becoming the people who lean over the tracks to see if a train is coming. This test of 'impulse control', one of Bar-On's components of emotional intelligence, turned out to be the single most important indicator for how well those kids adapted in terms of number of friends and performance in school, according to Stein.
Why this is correct: This is correct because 85 per cent of the children could not resist eating the marshmallow, which means most children failed to control the temptation.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'other 85 per cent' = Option: 'most children could not resist'
Tips: Always turn percentages into simple ideas like most or few.
Why the other options are wrong:
- B: Students may guess this using logic about age, but the passage only talks about three-year-olds. This is a Not Given trap.
- C: The train example is a metaphor, not a real situation. Taking it literally is a Paraphrase trap.
- D: Only the children who waited got a second marshmallow, and they were just 15 per cent. This is a Contradiction trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- withstood = resisted
- impulse control = ability to wait
Question Focus: Purpose question - asks why the EQ test is used
Correct Answer: C
Passage Reference: Bar-On and Stein see the test as a tool to create emotional profiles, which can be used to match people to suitable careers or to identify and improve weak areas. The statements cover five areas: intrapersonal, interpersonal, adaptability, stress management and general mood.
Why this is correct: This is correct because the test measures areas like interpersonal skills and stress management, which show how people manage relationships and pressure.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'interpersonal' and 'stress management' = Option: 'manage personal relationship and stress'
Tips: For purpose questions, look for phrases like see the test as or used to.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: This sentence appears at the start as a comment, not the purpose of the test. This is a Wrong section trap.
- B: The passage clearly says the test is not designed to uncover nuts, so it is not about mental illness. This is a Contradiction trap.
- D: The test can be used to match people to careers, but that is only one use, not the main purpose. This is a Partial truth trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- interpersonal = dealing with other people
- adaptability = ability to adjust
Question Focus: Inference question - asks why the writer makes a comment
Correct Answer: C
Passage Reference: For example, general mood consists of optimism and happiness. (Yours truly scored a full 20 points higher in happiness than in optimism. I'm still pretty happy, but I doubt it will last).
Why this is correct: This is correct because the writer explains he scored much higher in happiness than optimism, so he jokes that his happiness may not last.
Paraphrasing: Passage: '20 points higher in happiness than in optimism' = Option: 'scored much higher in happiness than in optimism'
Tips: When writers joke or comment personally, look just before the sentence for the reason.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: He scored high in happiness, but the problem is low optimism, not general mood overall. This is a Partial truth trap.
- B: The passage does not say he is pessimistic as a personality trait. This is a Not Given trap.
- D: Stress management is a different category and is not mentioned here. This is a Context shift trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- optimism = positive view of the future
- general mood = overall emotional state
Question Focus: Inference question - asks why TV journalists are more optimistic
Correct Answer: A
Passage Reference: 'We found that people in the electronic media tend to be more optimistic than those in the print media," Stein said. That difference can be easily explained. A few years back, this writer covered an auction of vintage Rolls-Royces and Bentleys for another publication. A prominent television journalist, who is safer left unidentified, also showed up. My optimism took a permanent hit that day, for whereas I was scrambling for a story, he came to shop. Although he might have a strong faith in the future, my broadcast brother could afford to be more lenient with his impulse control: if he opted to eat his marshmallow, he could always afford another Bentley-load.
Why this is correct: This is correct because the writer suggests TV journalists can afford expensive cars, showing they are wealthier, which explains their optimism.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'could always afford another Bentley-load' = Option: 'wealthier'
Tips: For inference questions, look for examples and stories, not direct statements.
Why the other options are wrong:
- B: Adaptability is one EQ area, but it is not mentioned as the reason here. This is a Context shift trap.
- C: Being prominent is implied but never stated as the cause of optimism. This is a Not Given trap.
- D: The passage does not say TV journalists have less stress. This is a Not Given trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- electronic media = television and broadcast media
- lenient = not strict
General Tips:
- MCQ questions follow passage order, so use the location of the previous answer to find the next.
- Do not choose options just because they sound logical in real life. Choose only what the passage supports.
- Watch for jokes and examples. They often explain the writer's real meaning.
- Eliminate wrong options first to make the correct answer clearer.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation