Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Next
IELTS Practice Reading: Choose Single Answer ID: #58040 Easy Yellow 17
Instructions ›
Choose the correct option for the following.
1 Select text → 2 Right-click → 3 Highlight or Add Note

Soviet’s new working week

Historian investigates how Stalin changed the calendar to keep the Soviet people continually at work.

A. “There are no fortresses that Bolsheviks cannot storm”. With these words, Stalin expressed the dynamic self-confidence of the Soviet Union’s Five Year Plan: weak and backward Russia was to turn overnight into a powerful modem industrial country. Between 1928 and 1932,production of coal, iron and steel increased at a fantastic rate, and new industrial cities sprang up, along with the world’s biggest dam. Everyone’s life was affected, as collectivised farming drove millions from the land to swell the industrial proletariat. Private enterprise disappeared in city and country, leaving the State supreme under the dictatorship of Stalin. Unlimited enthusiasm was the mood of the day, with the Communists believing that iron will and hard-working manpower alone would bring about a new world.

B. Enthusiasm spread to time itself, in the desire to make the state a huge efficient machine, where not a moment would be wasted, especially in the workplace. Lenin had already been intrigued by the ideas of the American Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856- 1915), whose time-motion studies had discovered ways of stream-lining effort so that every worker could produce the maximum. The Bolsheviks were also great admirers of Henry Ford’s assembly line mass production and of his Fordson tractors that were imported by the thousands. The engineers who came with them to train their users helped spread what became a real cult of Ford. Emulating and surpassing such capitalist models formed part of the training of the new Soviet Man, a heroic figure whose unlimited capacity for work would benefit everyone in the dynamic new society. All this culminated in the Plan, which has been characterized as the triumph of the machine, where workers would become supremely efficient robot-like creatures.

C. Yet this was Communism whose goals had always included improving the lives of the proletariat. One major step in that direction was the sudden announcement in 1927 that reduced the working day from eight to seven hours. In January 1929, all Indus-tries were ordered to adopt the shorter day by the end of the Plan. Workers were also to have an extra hour off on the eve of Sundays and holidays. Typically though, the state took away more than it gave, for this was part of a scheme to increase production by establishing a three-shift system. This meant that the factories were open day and night and that many had to work at highly undesirable hours.

D. Hardly had that policy been announced, though, than Yuri Larin, who had been a close associate of Lenin and architect of his radical economic policy, came up with an idea for even greater efficiency. Workers were free and plants were closed on Sundays. Why not abolish that wasted day by instituting a continuous work week so that the machines could operate to their full capacity every day of the week? When Larin presented his idea to the Congress of Soviets in May 1929, no one paid much attention. Soon after, though, he got the ear of Stalin, who approved. Suddenly, in June, the Soviet press was filled with articles praising the new scheme. In August, the Council of Peoples’ Commissars ordered that the continuous work week be brought into immediate effect, during the height of enthusiasm for the Plan, whose goals the new schedule seemed guaranteed to forward.

E. The idea seemed simple enough, but turned out to be very complicated in practice. Obviously, the workers couldn’t be made to work seven days a week, nor should their total work hours be increased. The Solution was ingenious: a new five-day week would have the workers on the job for four days, with the fifth day free; holidays would be reduced from ten to five, and the extra hour off on the eve of rest days would be abolished. Staggering the rest-days between groups of workers meant that each worker would spend the same number of hours on the job, but the factories would be working a full 360 days a year instead of 300. The 360 divided neatly into 72 five-day weeks. Workers in each establishment (at first factories,then stores and offices) were divided into five groups, each assigned a colour which appeared on the new Uninterrupted Work Week calendars distributed all over the country. Colour-coding was a valuable mnemonic device, since workers might have trouble remembering what their day off was going to be, for it would change every week. A glance at the colour on the calendar would reveal the free day, and allow workers to plan their activities. This system, however, did not apply to construction or seasonal occupations, which followed a six-day week, or to factories or mines which had to close regularly for maintenance: they also had a six-day week, whether interrupted (with the same day off for everyone) or continuous. In all cases, though, Sunday was treated like any other day.

F. Official propaganda touted the material and cultural benefits of the new scheme. Workers would get more rest; production and employment would increase (for more workers would be needed to keep the factories running continuously); the standard of living would improve. Leisure time would be more rationally employed, for cultural activities (theatre, clubs, sports) would no longer have to be crammed into a weekend, but could flourish every day, with their facilities far less crowded. Shopping would be easier for the same reasons. Ignorance and superstition, as represented by organized religion, would suffer a mortal blow, since 80 per cent of the workers would be on the job on any given Sunday. The only objection concerned the family, where normally more than one member was working.

1
According to paragraph A, Soviet’s five year plan was a success because
Highlight
Clear Highlight
Clear All Highlights
Add Note
Delete Note
Delete All Notes
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Question Focus: Detail question - asks why the Five Year Plan was seen as successful

Correct Answer: C

Why this is correct: This is correct because the passage clearly says that production of coal, iron and steel increased at a fantastic rate. This increase in industrial production is the direct evidence of success mentioned in the paragraph.

Passage Reference: Between 1928 and 1932?production of coal, iron and steel increased at a fantastic rate, and new industrial cities sprang up, along with the world's biggest dam. Everyone's life was affected, as collectivised farming drove millions from the land to swell the industrial proletariat.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'production of coal, iron and steel increased at a fantastic rate' = Option: 'Industrial production increased'

Tips: For detail questions, always look for numbers or clear facts. They usually prove the answer.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • A: Students may pick this because the paragraph starts with a quote about fortresses. However, this is a metaphor, not a real reason for success. No actual fortress was built. This is a Paraphrase trap.
  • B: Students may choose this because the passage mentions Russia was weak and backward. However, that describes the situation before the plan, not why it succeeded. This is a Wrong section trap.
  • D: Stalin's confidence is mentioned, but confidence alone is not proof of success. The question asks why it was a success, and the passage proves this with production figures. This is a Partial truth trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • production = making goods
  • industrial = related to factories

Question Focus: Detail question - asks the reason for reducing daily working hours

Correct Answer: B

Passage Reference: Yet this was Communism whose goals had always included improving the lives of the proletariat. One major step in that direction was the sudden announcement in 1927 that reduced the working day from eight to seven hours. Typically though, the state took away more than it gave, for this was part of a scheme to increase production by establishing a three-shift system.

Why this is correct: This is correct because the passage explains that the shorter working day was part of a scheme to increase production. So the real aim was higher industrial productivity, not kindness to workers.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'part of a scheme to increase production' = Option: 'boost industrial productivity'

Tips: When the passage says 'this was part of a scheme', that sentence usually explains the real reason.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • A: Students may choose this because the paragraph mentions improving workers' lives. However, the passage then explains the real purpose was increasing production. This is a Partial truth trap.
  • C: Undesirable work hours are mentioned later as a result, not as the purpose of cutting hours. This is a Causation trap.
  • D: The three-shift system already existed and was strengthened by this change. The goal was not to change it but to use it to raise production. This is a Contradiction trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • scheme = plan
  • productivity = amount produced

Question Focus: Inference question - asks why managers said they followed the new system

Correct Answer: A

Passage Reference: Soon after, though, he got the ear of Stalin, who approved. Suddenly, in June, the Soviet press was filled with articles praising the new scheme. In August, the Council of Peoples' Commissars ordered that the continuous work week be brought into immediate effect.

Why this is correct: This is correct because the passage shows that the new work week was ordered by the state and strongly promoted. This implies that managers complied because they were under pressure from the government.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'ordered that the continuous work week be brought into immediate effect' = Option: 'they were pressurized by the state to do so'

Tips: For inference questions, look for power words like 'ordered' or 'approved'. They often show pressure or control.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • B: Students may think managers agreed because the idea looked simple. However, the passage later says it was very complicated in practice. This is a Contradiction trap.
  • C: Being able to apply the system is never stated. In fact, many difficulties are described later. This is a Not Given trap.
  • D: Workers' feelings are not discussed here, and manager decisions are not linked to workers' hatred. This is a Context shift trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • ordered = officially told to do
  • pressurized = forced or strongly pushed

General Tips:

  • MCQ questions follow passage order. Use the location of the previous answer to find the next one faster.
  • Always ask yourself what the question is really asking. Reason, result, or description.
  • Be careful with options that repeat exact words from the passage. Check the meaning, not just the words.
  • Use elimination. If an option talks about something before or after the focus point, it is likely wrong.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Saving...