| YES | if the statement agrees with the views of the writer |
| NO | if the statement contradicts the views of the writer |
| NOT GIVEN | if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this |
More media, less news
1. The first thing to greet a visitor to the Oslo headquarters of Schibsted, a Norwegian newspaper firm, is its original, hand-operated printing press from 1856, now so clean and polished it looks more like a sculpture than a machine. Christian Schibsted, the firm’s founder, bought it to print someone else's newspaper, but when the contract moved elsewhere he decided to start his own. Although Schibsted gives pride of place to its antique machinery, the company is in fact running away from its printed past as fast as it can. Having made a loss five years ago. Schibsted's activities on the internet contributed 35% of last year’s operating profits.
2. Unfortunately for the newspaper industry. Schibsted is a rare exception. For most newspaper companies in the developed world, 2005 was miserable. They still earn almost all of their profits from print, which is in decline. As people look to the internet for news and young people turn away from papers, paid-for circulations are falling year after year. Papers are also losing their share of advertising spending. Classified advertising is quickly moving online. Jim Chisholm, of iMedia, a joint-venture consultancy with IFRA, a newspaper trade association, predicts that a quarter of print classified ads will be lost to digital media in the next ten years. Overall, says iMedia, newspapers claimed 36% of total global advertising in 1995 and 30% in 2005. It reckons they will lose another five percentage points by 2015.
3. Even the most confident of newspaper bosses now agree that they will survive in the long term only if, like Schibsted, they can reinvent themselves on the internet and on other new-media platforms such as mobile phones and portable electronic devices. Most have been slow to grasp the changes affecting their industry- ‘remarkably, unaccountably complacent', as Rupert Murdoch put it in a speech last year-but now they are making a big push to catch up. Internet advertising is growing rapidly for many and is beginning to offset some of the decline in print.
4. At first, from the late 1990s until around 2002, newspaper companies simply replicated their print editions online. Yet the internet offers so many specialised sources of information and entertainment that readers can pick exactly what they want from different websites. As a result, people visited newspaper sites infrequently, looked at a few pages and then vanished off to someone else's website. Another early mistake was for papers to save their best journalists for print. This meant that the quality of new online editions was often poor. Websites hired younger, cheaper staff. The brand's prestige stayed with the old medium, v/hich encouraged print journalists to defend their turf. Still today at La Stampa, an Italian daily paper owned by the Fiat Group, says Anna Masera, the paper’s internet chief, print journalists hesitate to give her their stories for fear that the website will cannibalise the newspaper.
5. For the past couple of years, however, newspapers have been thinking more boldly about what to do on the internet. At its most basic, that means reporting stories using cameras and microphones as well as print.
More newspaper companies are likely to treat their websites as a priority these days. ‘Before, newspapers used their second- and third-rate journalists for the internet,' says Edward Roussel, online editorial director at Britain's Telegraph Group, ‘but now we know we’ve got to use our very best'. Many companies are putting print journalists in the same room as those who work online, so that print writers are working for the website and vice versa. Some insist that this is a mistake. ‘It is completely wrong not to separate web and paper operations,’ says Oscar Bronner. publisher of Dor Standard, a daily paper in Austria. Print journalists don't have time to reflect and analyse properly if they also have to work for the website, he argues.
6. How impressive are the results of these online experiments? At lots of newspaper companies, internet advertising is growing by at least 30% a year, and often more. At la Republica in Italy, for instance, the paper's website gets about 1 m visitors a day. nearly double the circulation of the printed paper. The value of online ads grew by 70% in the first half of 2006. For the first three months of 2006, the Newspaper Association of America announced that advertising for all the country's newspaper websites grew by 35% from the same period in 2005, to a total of $613m. But to put that in perspective, print and online ads together grew by only 1.8%, to $11 billion, because print advertising was flat. At almost all newspapers the internet brings in less than a tenth of revenues and profits. At this point, says Mr Chisholm, 'Newspapers are halfway to realising an audience on the internet and about a tenth of the way to building a business online.'
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Question Focus: Writer opinion that newspapers need leaders who can reinvent the business for the internet.
Correct Answer: YES
Why this is correct: The writer clearly supports the idea that newspapers need leaders who can see the future and change direction. Saying they must reinvent themselves and were slow to grasp change shows the writer agrees the industry would benefit from more visionary executives.
Passage Reference: Even the most confident of newspaper bosses now agree that they will survive in the long term only if, like Schibsted, they can reinvent themselves on the internet and on other new-media platforms such as mobile phones and portable electronic devices. Most have been slow to grasp the changes affecting their industry.
Common Mistake: Answering NOT GIVEN because the statement is not word-for-word in the passage. This is a Synonym match trap.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'reinvent themselves' and 'slow to grasp the changes' = Statement: 'visionary executives' and 'would benefit'
Tips: For YES answers, look for strong opinion phrases like 'will survive only if' which clearly show the writer's view.
Key Vocabulary:
- reinvent = change completely
- visionary = able to see the future
Question Focus: Difference between reporting what people think and the writer's own opinion.
Correct Answer: NOT GIVEN
Passage Reference: Still today at La Stampa, an Italian daily paper owned by the Fiat Group, says Anna Masera, the paper's internet chief, print journalists hesitate to give her their stories for fear that the website will cannibalise the newspaper.
Why this is correct: The passage reports what print journalists are afraid of, not what the writer thinks they should do. The writer does not say that journalists should avoid sharing stories, so the opinion in the statement is not expressed.
Common Mistake: Answering YES because the passage mentions hesitation. This is a Context shift trap.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'hesitate to give her their stories' = Statement: 'should avoid giving their stories'
Tips: In YNNG, ask yourself: is this the writer's opinion or just a description of other people's behaviour?
Key Vocabulary:
- hesitate = feel unsure
- cannibalise = take away from
Question Focus: Writer disagreement with an extreme replacement idea.
Correct Answer: NO
Passage Reference: For the past couple of years, however, newspapers have been thinking more boldly about what to do on the internet. At its most basic, that means reporting stories using cameras and microphones as well as print.
Why this is correct: The writer supports adding video and audio but clearly says it is alongside print, not instead of it. This directly disagrees with the idea of replacing print completely.
Common Mistake: Answering YES because video is mentioned. This is a Extreme language trap.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'as well as print' = Statement: 'replace print'
Tips: Be careful with words like 'replace'. If the passage says 'as well as', the meaning is the opposite.
Key Vocabulary:
- replace = take the place of
- as well as = together with
Question Focus: Writer opinion supported by evaluative language and statistics.
Correct Answer: YES
Passage Reference: At lots of newspaper companies, internet advertising is growing by at least 30% a year, and often more. But to put that in perspective, print and online ads together grew by only 1.8%. At almost all newspapers the internet brings in less than a tenth of revenues and profits.
Why this is correct: The writer agrees that internet advertising is growing but clearly judges it to be a small part of overall income. The phrase 'to put that in perspective' shows the writer's evaluation.
Common Mistake: Answering NOT GIVEN because there are many numbers. This is a Partial truth trap.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'less than a tenth of revenues and profits' = Statement: 'very small part of the proceeds'
Tips: Opinion can be shown through comparison and comments like 'to put that in perspective', not only words like 'should'.
Key Vocabulary:
- proceeds = money earned
- revenue = income
General Tips:
- YNNG tests the WRITER'S VIEW, not passage facts. If the passage states a fact without the writer commenting, that is NOT GIVEN for opinion.
- YNNG statements follow passage order, so use the previous answer to help you find the next section faster.
- Watch for extreme words like 'replace', 'avoid', or 'only'. These often signal NO answers.
- Look for opinion signals such as 'will survive only if', 'unfortunately', or evaluative comments like 'to put that in perspective'.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation