Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
IELTS Practice Reading: Yes, No, Not Given ID: #56901 Easy Latex Sensitivity
Instructions ›
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer?
YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the views of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
Tap any word for its meaning

Latex Sensitivity

A. Christopher Robin wanted Father Christmas to bring him “a big red India rubber ball”; others have a less innocent enthusiasm for the sap of Hevea brasiliensis the rubber tree. But though latex rubber is useful for many purposes, it also carries risks. Some people are highly sensitive to the stuff — so much so that they can die from being exposed to it.

B. Nobody knows which or how many of the hundreds of proteins in latex provoke the allergic reactions that natural rubber causes in 1 % of people. But whatever its cause, latex sensitivity is beginning to attract attention. Last week America’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) joined forces with the Centres for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health to sponsor an international conference in Baltimore on latex sensitivity. Almost 400 scientists, nurses, doctors and dentists, along with representatives of the rubber industry, turned up. The medical professions use latex a lot; they are well placed to notice adverse reactions and to deal with them.

C. Consider as an example the latex cuff used when the bowel is filled with barium and examined with X-rays — a common procedure. That these barium enemas can cause anaphylactic shock, a life-threatening allergic reaction, has been known for decades. What is new is the discovery that the cuff of the enema nozzle can produce this reaction on its own. Of 407 such cases of shock reported to the FDA in the past four years, 15 have been fatal. There may well have been other cases, not recognized as being due to latex sensitivity. The largest manufacturers of the cuffs now make them of a synthetic material.

D. Other patients at risk include children with spina bifida, a defect of the spine; these children usually cannot urinate without a catheter, and can face as many as 20 corrective operations before reaching adulthood, so they come into contact with all sorts of medical apparatus that contain latex. And for people predisposed to latex sensitivity, the more frequent and prolonged their exposure, the worse the reaction can become. These days, staff caring for children with spina bifida are aware of the potential for trouble; so precautions are taken to prevent their becoming sensitive to latex and to protect them if sensitized already. Most of the children are operated on in theatres that have been made as latex-free as possible, and none has been lost to shock.

E. The danger affects health workers as well as patients. People who need to wear rubber gloves at work are the largest single group at risk, and the AIDS epidemic has greatly increased their number. Doctors, nurses, dental hygienists and laboratory technicians who used to wear gloves only occasionally now find themselves changing them as often as 30 times a day. And the cornstarch with which the gloves are often dusted spreads small amounts of latex all around the place. Some studies have found that as many as 10% of health workers have developed latex-related skin conditions or other allergic reactions. Should they then need an operation, or other medical procedure, entailing exposures to latex, they may run into further complications. Indeed, some sufferers have been so incapacitated by the problem that they have had to change jobs.

F. Of course, other people use latex, too. The sensitivity was first noticed in someone using household rubber gloves. It can also afflict the users of condoms or diaphragms. No deaths have been reported in these groups, though, and levels of reaction are quite low. It is worth noting that the remedy for anaphylactic shock is adrenalin.

G. Despite the worries, latex is such an exceptional material — nothing else so cheap is such a good, long-lasting barrier, while at the same time allowing tactile sensitivity — that there is no talk of getting rid of it. A better solution is to label products carefully and to screen people for sensitivity. In the longer term, refinements in manufacturing might make the substance less allergenic. Or people could use a different rubber; latex produced from guayule, a shrub which grows exuberantly in America’s south-west, shows signs of having fewer allergens.

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Question Focus: Writer opinion - cooperation between medical bodies and the rubber industry

Correct Answer: YES

Why this is correct: The writer clearly shows that both medical professionals and industry representatives are actively involved. By describing them working together at a conference, the writer supports this view.

Passage Reference: Last week America's Food and Drug Administration (FDA) joined forces with the Centres for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health to sponsor an international conference in Baltimore on latex sensitivity. Almost 400 scientists, nurses, doctors and dentists, along with representatives of the rubber industry, turned up.

Common Mistake: NOT GIVEN - Not Given trap. Students think cooperation is only implied, but it is clearly stated.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'representatives of the rubber industry' = Statement: 'workers in industry'

Tips: When the writer describes groups acting together, that usually signals agreement with the idea.

Key Vocabulary:

  • representatives = people speaking for a group
  • tackling = dealing with

Question Focus: Writer disagreement - the passage says the opposite

Correct Answer: NO

Passage Reference: These days, staff caring for children with spina bifida are aware of the potential for trouble; so precautions are taken to prevent their becoming sensitive to latex and to protect them if sensitized already. Most of the children are operated on in theatres that have been made as latex-free as possible, and none has been lost to shock.

Why this is correct: The writer directly says that none of the children died from shock. This clearly contradicts the statement.

Common Mistake: NOT GIVEN - Contradiction trap. The passage actually gives clear opposite information.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'none has been lost to shock' = Statement: 'died of anaphylactic shock'

Tips: If the passage clearly says the opposite, the answer must be NO, not NOT GIVEN.

Key Vocabulary:

  • lost to shock = died from shock
  • precautions = safety steps

Question Focus: Missing opinion - cause mentioned but not heredity

Correct Answer: NOT GIVEN

Passage Reference: Nobody knows which or how many of the hundreds of proteins in latex provoke the allergic reactions that natural rubber causes in 1 % of people. But whatever its cause, latex sensitivity is beginning to attract attention.

Why this is correct: The writer says the cause is unknown and does not mention genetics or heredity at all. There is no opinion about hereditary factors.

Common Mistake: YES - Not Given trap. Students assume a cause that is never stated.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'whatever its cause' = Statement: 'usually caused by hereditary factors'

Tips: If a cause is not mentioned clearly, do not guess. Choose NOT GIVEN.

Key Vocabulary:

  • hereditary = passed from parents
  • provoke = cause

Question Focus: Writer disagreement - latex is not being replaced

Correct Answer: NO

Passage Reference: Despite the worries, latex is such an exceptional material - nothing else so cheap is such a good, long-lasting barrier, while at the same time allowing tactile sensitivity - that there is no talk of getting rid of it.

Why this is correct: The writer clearly states that latex will not be replaced. This directly disagrees with the idea of replacing it with new materials.

Common Mistake: YES - Partial truth trap. Students notice alternatives mentioned but miss that latex is not being replaced.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'no talk of getting rid of it' = Statement: 'replace latex'

Tips: Always check if the writer supports or rejects the idea, not just mentions related information.

Key Vocabulary:

  • exceptional = very special
  • replace = take the place of

Question Focus: Writer opinion - AIDS epidemic increased glove use

Correct Answer: YES

Passage Reference: People who need to wear rubber gloves at work are the largest single group at risk, and the AIDS epidemic has greatly increased their number. Doctors, nurses, dental hygienists and laboratory technicians who used to wear gloves only occasionally now find themselves changing them as often as 30 times a day.

Why this is correct: The writer links the AIDS epidemic to increased glove use among health workers. This supports the statement clearly.

Common Mistake: NOT GIVEN - Context shift trap. The reason for glove use is clearly explained.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'AIDS epidemic has greatly increased their number' = Statement: 'fearful of catching AIDS'

Tips: Look for cause-and-effect language that shows the writer's view.

Key Vocabulary:

  • epidemic = widespread disease
  • occasionally = sometimes

Question Focus: Writer disagreement - cure is mentioned

Correct Answer: NO

Passage Reference: No deaths have been reported in these groups, though, and levels of reaction are quite low. It is worth noting that the remedy for anaphylactic shock is adrenalin.

Why this is correct: The writer explicitly states that there is a remedy. This contradicts the statement that there is no cure.

Common Mistake: NOT GIVEN - Contradiction trap. The passage clearly gives the opposite information.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'the remedy ... is adrenalin' = Statement: 'has no cure'

Tips: When a treatment or solution is stated, claims of no cure are usually wrong.

Key Vocabulary:

  • remedy = treatment
  • anaphylactic shock = severe allergic reaction

Question Focus: Writer disagreement - risk is higher for health workers

Correct Answer: NO

Passage Reference: The danger affects health workers as well as patients. People who need to wear rubber gloves at work are the largest single group at risk.

Why this is correct: The writer clearly identifies health workers, not children, as the group most at risk. This disagrees with the statement.

Common Mistake: YES - Context shift trap. Children are discussed, but not as the most affected group.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'largest single group at risk' = Statement: 'more likely to suffer'

Tips: Do not confuse examples with comparisons. Look for words like 'most' or 'largest'.

Key Vocabulary:

  • at risk = likely to be harmed
  • affects = has an impact on

General Tips:

  • YNNG tests the WRITER'S VIEW, not passage facts. A fact without opinion is NOT GIVEN.
  • YES and NO require clear support or disagreement from the writer.
  • Statements usually follow passage order. Use the previous answer to know where to read next.
  • Watch for contradiction words like 'none', 'no talk of', or 'largest group'.
  • Do not assume causes or comparisons that the writer does not clearly state.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...