Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
LanguageCert Practice Reading: Part 4: Long Text MCQ ID: #60304 Hard Intelligence Tests and Different Age Groups
Instructions ›
Read the article about Intelligence And Aging and answer the questions.

When does intelligence peak?

[PARA:A]

As people get older, they may feel as though their intelligence is rapidly declining. However, research on the topic suggests some really interesting variations. In one large series of studies, Joshua Hartshorne and Laura Germine from the Department of Psychology at Harvard University presented evidence from 48,537 people from standardized IQ and memory tests. The results revealed that processing speed and short-term memory for family pictures and stories peak and begin to decline around high school graduation; some visual-spatial and abstract reasoning abilities plateau in early adulthood, beginning to decline in the 30s; and, still, other cognitive functions, such as vocabulary and general information, do not peak until people reach their 40s or later.

[PARA:B]

The picture gets even more complicated, however, once we take into account the ‘dark matter’ of intelligence. In the intelligence field, there is a distinction between ‘fluid’ intelligence (abstract reasoning and pattern detection) and ‘crystallized’ intelligence (vocabulary and general knowledge). But domain-specific knowledge - the dark matter of intelligence - is not identical to either fluid or crystallized intelligence. Most IQ tests, which were only ever designed for testing schoolchildren, do not include the rich depth of knowledge acquired after extensive immersion in a field. So, while it is true that, when measured by the standards of youth, middle-aged adults might not be as ‘intelligent’ as young adults, once dark matter is taken into account, middle-aged adults might well be up to par.

[PARA:C]

Professor Phillip Ackerman from the Georgia Institute of Technology wonders whether we should be judging adult intelligence by the same standard we judge childhood intelligence. To dive deeper into this question, Ackerman administered a wide variety of domain-specific knowledge tests to 288 adults who were educated to college level and between the ages of 21 and 62. Domains included art, music, world literature, biology, physics, psychology, technology, law, astronomy, and electronics. Ackerman found that in general, middle-aged adults are more knowledgeable in many domains compared with younger adults. As for the implications of this finding, his paper states: "Many intellectually demanding tasks in the real world cannot be accomplished without a vast repertoire of declarative knowledge and procedural skills." Using an example from academia and how several years of intense study and empirical research experience are required before even the best college student could be expected to deliver a flawless doctoral thesis defense, he argues: "Knowledge does not compensate for a declining adult intelligence; it is intelligence!"

[PARA:D]

There was an important exception to Ackerman's finding, however. All three science-related tests were negatively associated with age. Tellingly, these three tests were most strongly correlated with fluid intelligence. Nevertheless, on the whole, these results should be considered good news for older adults. Unless you are trying to win the Nobel Prize for Physics at a very old age, there are a lot of domains of knowledge that you can continue to learn in throughout your life. What is more, Ackerman found that certain measures of personality, such as intellectual curiosity, were related to domain-specific knowledge above and beyond the effects of standard measures of intelligence.

[PARA:E]

And if you do want to maintain your fluid intelligence as long as possible, there is recent research suggesting that having a greater purpose in life can help protect against cognitive decline among older adults. Professor Giyeon Kim and her colleagues at Chung-Ang University in the Republic of Korea looked at various aspects of purpose, including: whether one cares about the future and whether one has a good sense of what one wishes to accomplish in the future. They found that purpose in life acted as a protective factor against cognitive decline and have argued that it could be used as a treatment technique for cognitive decline in clinical settings.

[PARA:F]

Their research adds to a growing literature showing the many benefits of maintaining a purpose in life for health and well-being. Greater purpose in life has been linked to increased longevity, reduced risk of stroke and cardiovascular problems, and fewer incidences of sleep disturbance. One study done over a 10-year period found that increased meaning in life was associated with lower allostatic load (the wear and tear on the body). This is important considering that allostatic load has also been positively linked with increased risk of diseases, mortality, and cognitive decline. The good news for older adults is that not only can they continue to acquire domain-specific knowledge into older age, but purpose in life is also modifiable.

1
What can be concluded from Hartshorne and Germine’s research?
2
The phrase ‘up to par’ is used in the second paragraph to argue that
3
What do we learn about Professor Ackerman’s research study in the third paragraph?
4
During his research, Ackerman found evidence confirming the belief that
5
Professor Kim’s investigation of cognitive decline in older adults
6
In the final paragraph, the writer emphasizes that
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Question Focus: Asks what can be concluded from Hartshorne and Germine's research (Inference).

Correct Answer: D

Why this is correct: Option D is correct because the study shows different abilities peak at different ages, so a person cannot be at their best in all mental tasks at once. This is an Inference question - the conclusion is drawn from the pattern of peak times. Some skills are sharpest young, others much later.

Question Focus: Asks what 'up to par' is used to argue (Attribution / Inference).

Correct Answer: C

Why this is correct: The answer is Option C because 'up to par' argues that if we count deep expertise (the 'dark matter'), middle-aged adults match younger adults - so they can be seen as equally intelligent. The point is that ordinary tests miss this expertise. Include it, and the age gap closes.

Question Focus: Asks what we learn about Ackerman's study in paragraph three (Detail / Attribution).

Correct Answer: D

Why this is correct: Option D is correct because the participants had to fit set conditions - college-educated and aged 21 to 62. So 'the participants all had to meet certain criteria' matches the text closely. Those limits are stated plainly.

Question Focus: Asks what belief Ackerman's research confirmed (Inference / Attribution).

Correct Answer: C

Why this is correct: Option C is correct because science knowledge fell with age, and the Nobel-Physics remark infers that top scientific ability tends to belong to the young. So the research confirms the belief that scientific genius is more common in younger people. The science tests were the clear exception to the good news.

Question Focus: Asks what Professor Kim's investigation of cognitive decline has led to (Attribution).

Correct Answer: A

Why this is correct: The answer is 'has led to the suggestion that it might be slowed by using certain interventions'. Kim's team found purpose in life is a protective factor against cognitive decline, and they have argued it could be used as a treatment technique. The words 'could be used' show a suggestion, and a treatment technique is an intervention.

Question Focus: Asks what the writer emphasises in the final paragraph (Synthesis).

Correct Answer: A

Why this is correct: Option A is correct because the paragraph synthesises the health research: a strong sense of purpose - a good mental outlook - brings many physical benefits as we age, from longer life to less wear on the body. So the mind helps the body. That is the writer's closing emphasis.

General Tips:

  • The right answer almost never copies the text word for word. It says the same idea in different words, so hunt for matching meaning, not matching vocabulary.
  • Keep each researcher's finding separate - Hartshorne and Germine, Ackerman, and Kim each studied something different. A wrong option often takes a true finding from one study and links it to the wrong one.
  • For inference questions, ask yourself: does the text actually point to this, or am I just using my own general knowledge? Your answer must be backed by a clue in the passage.
  • Watch out for options that use real words from the text but bend them to the wrong meaning, wrong person, or wrong paragraph. Right words do not always mean the right answer.
  • For the final question, step back and look at the whole article. The answer usually pulls together ideas from more than one paragraph, so think about the writer's big message.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Saving...