Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #31524 October Prediction Guilt and Responsibility
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
The  narrative  of  law  and  order  is  located  fundamentally  at  the  level  of  individual  guilt  and  responsibility.  Criminal  acts  are  seen  as  individual  issues  of  personal  responsibility  and  ,  to  which  the  state  responds  by  way  of  policing,  ,  adjudication  and  punishment.  This  is  but  one  level  at  which  crime  and  criminal  justice  can  be  analysed.  The  problem  is  that  so  often  analysis  ends  there,  at  the  level  of  individual  action,    in  terms  of  responsibility,  guilt,  evil.  In  few  other  areas  of  social  life  does  individualism  have  this  hold.  To  take  but  one  ,  it  would  be  absurd  to  restrict  analysis  of  obesity,  to  individual  greed.  It  should  similarly  be  widely  seen  as  absurd  to  restrict  analysis  of  criminal  justice  issues  to  the  culpability  of  individuals.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: culpability

Explanation: The term 'culpability' fits grammatically as it refers to the degree of responsibility or blame that an individual holds for a criminal act. It aligns contextually with the discussion of individual guilt and responsibility, making it the most appropriate choice in this context.

Meaning: Culpability means being responsible for a wrongdoing or crime, indicating that someone can be held accountable for their actions.

Wrong options:

  • probability: Probability refers to the likelihood of an event occurring, which does not relate to individual responsibility in a legal context.
  • facility: Facility refers to ease of doing something or a place for a specific purpose, which does not connect to the concept of individual guilt or responsibility.
  • capability: Capability refers to the ability to do something, which does not address the moral or legal responsibility associated with criminal acts.
Correct answer: prosecution

Explanation: The word 'prosecution' is the correct choice as it refers to the legal proceedings against someone accused of a crime. It fits grammatically and contextually within the framework of law enforcement actions following individual criminal acts.

Meaning: Prosecution means the act of bringing a legal case against someone in a court of law, typically by the state or government.

Wrong options:

  • execution: Execution refers to carrying out a death sentence, which is not relevant to the legal process described here.
  • refusing: Refusing does not fit contextually as it implies denial rather than a legal action taken against an individual.
  • prisoning: Prisoning is not a standard term in legal contexts; the correct term is 'imprisonment,' which does not fit the grammatical structure here.
Correct answer: characterised

Explanation: The term 'characterised' fits grammatically as it describes how individual actions are defined or understood in terms of responsibility and guilt. It aligns contextually with the preceding discussion about individualism in crime analysis.

Meaning: Characterised means to describe or define the nature of something, in this case, how individual actions are viewed in the context of responsibility.

Wrong options:

  • vapourized: Vapourized means to turn into vapor, which is unrelated to the context of individual actions and responsibility.
  • collateralilzed: Collateralized refers to securing a loan with collateral, which does not apply to the discussion of individual actions in criminal justice.
  • exercised: Exercised means to put into action or practice, which does not fit the context of defining individual actions in terms of guilt.
Correct answer: instance

Explanation: The word 'instance' fits grammatically as it refers to a specific example or case, which is appropriate in the context of discussing individualism in social issues. It aligns contextually with the idea of providing an example to illustrate a point.

Meaning: Instance means a particular case or example of something, used here to highlight a specific situation related to individualism.

Wrong options:

  • substance: Substance refers to the material or essence of something, which does not relate to providing an example in this context.
  • resent: Resent means to feel bitterness or indignation, which does not fit the grammatical or contextual requirements of the sentence.
  • accent: Accent refers to a distinctive way of pronouncing a language or a feature that stands out, which is not relevant to the discussion of examples in social analysis.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 50% Easy · 0% Medium · 50% Hard
Saving...