Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #31570 Seatbelt
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
I  am  a  cyclist  and  a  motorist.  I  fasten  my  seatbelt  when  I  drive  and  wear  a  helmet  on  my  bike  to  reduce  the  risk  of  injury.  I  am  convinced  that  these  are  prudent    measures.  I  have  persuaded  many  friends  to  wear  helmets  because  transplant  surgeons  call  those  without  helmets,  "donors  on  wheels”.  But  a  book  on  'Risk’  by  my  colleague  John  Adams  has  made  me  re-examine  my  .  Adams  has  completely    my  confidence  in  these  sensible  precautions.  What  he  has  persuasively  argued,  particularly  about  seat  belts,  is  that  the  evidence  that  they  do  what  they  are  supposed  to  do  is  very  suspect.  This  is    numerous  claims  that  seat  belts  save  many  thousands  of  lives  every  year.
There  is  remarkable  data  on  the  years  1970  and  1978  countries  in  which  the  wearing  of  seat  belts  is    to  have  had  on  average  about  5  per  cent  more  road  accident  deaths  following  the  introduction  of  the  law.  In  the  UK,  road  deaths  have  decreased  steadily  from  about  7,000  a  year  in  1972  to  just  over  4,000  in  1989.  There  is  no  evidence  in  the  trend  for  any  effect  of  the  seat  belt  law  that  was  introduced  in  1983.  Moreover,  there  is  evidence  that  the  number  of  cyclists  and  pedestrians  killed  increased  by  about  10  per  cent.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: safety

Explanation: The word 'safety' fits grammatically as it is a noun that describes the measures taken to protect oneself from harm. It aligns contextually with the preceding sentence, which discusses precautions taken to reduce the risk of injury, making it the most relevant choice.

Meaning: 'Safety' refers to the condition of being protected from or unlikely to cause danger, risk, or injury, which is the essence of the measures being discussed.

Wrong options:

  • great: The word 'great' is an adjective that does not appropriately describe measures; it lacks the specific connotation of protection that 'safety' provides.
  • first: The word 'first' implies a sequence or priority, which does not relate to the context of protective measures, making it irrelevant here.
  • likely: The word 'likely' suggests probability, which does not fit as it does not describe the nature of the measures being taken.
Correct answer: convictions

Explanation: The term 'convictions' is a noun that refers to firmly held beliefs or opinions, which fits well in the context of re-examining one's beliefs about safety measures. It is grammatically correct and contextually appropriate as it relates to the author's personal beliefs.

Meaning: 'Convictions' means strong beliefs or opinions that someone holds, particularly in the context of personal safety and risk assessment.

Wrong options:

  • affirmations: The word 'affirmations' refers to statements of support or agreement, which does not fit the context of personal beliefs being questioned or re-evaluated.
  • restrictions: The word 'restrictions' implies limitations or controls, which does not align with the idea of personal beliefs or opinions being reconsidered.
  • locations: The word 'locations' refers to places, which is entirely unrelated to the context of beliefs or opinions.
Correct answer: undermined

Explanation: The word 'undermined' is a verb that means to weaken or damage something, which fits grammatically and contextually as it describes how the author's confidence has been affected by the arguments presented by Adams. It conveys a sense of loss of trust in the previously held beliefs.

Meaning: 'Undermined' means to weaken or damage something, particularly in terms of confidence or trust, which is relevant to the author's experience.

Wrong options:

  • selected: The word 'selected' implies choosing something, which does not fit the context of affecting confidence; it does not convey the intended meaning of weakening.
  • restored: The word 'restored' suggests bringing something back to a previous state, which contradicts the context of losing confidence.
  • directed: The word 'directed' implies guiding or managing, which does not relate to the concept of confidence being weakened.
Correct answer: in spite of

Explanation: The phrase 'in spite of' is a prepositional phrase that indicates a contrast or concession, fitting grammatically and contextually as it introduces the idea that the argument holds despite the claims made about seat belts saving lives.

Meaning: 'In spite of' means regardless of or despite something, indicating that the argument is valid even when faced with opposing claims.

Wrong options:

  • in thought of: The phrase 'in thought of' is not a standard expression in English and does not convey the intended meaning of contrast or concession.
  • in lot of: The phrase 'in lot of' is grammatically incorrect and does not make sense in this context, lacking clarity and meaning.
  • in kind of: The phrase 'in kind of' does not fit grammatically or contextually, as it does not convey the intended contrast between the argument and the claims.
Correct answer: compulsory

Explanation: The word 'compulsory' is an adjective that means required by law or rule, fitting grammatically and contextually as it describes the legal requirement for wearing seat belts. It aligns with the discussion about laws and safety measures.

Meaning: 'Compulsory' means mandatory or required, indicating that wearing seat belts is not optional but a legal obligation.

Wrong options:

  • rested: The word 'rested' is a verb that does not fit the context of legal requirements; it is unrelated to the concept of obligation.
  • necessary: The word 'necessary' is an adjective that implies something is needed, but it lacks the legal connotation that 'compulsory' provides.
  • lacking: The word 'lacking' suggests absence, which contradicts the context of discussing a requirement; it does not fit the sentence structure.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...