There is remarkable data on the years 1970 and 1978 countries in which the wearing of seat belts is to have had on average about 5 per cent more road accident deaths following the introduction of the law. In the UK, road deaths have decreased steadily from about 7,000 a year in 1972 to just over 4,000 in 1989. There is no evidence in the trend for any effect of the seat belt law that was introduced in 1983. Moreover, there is evidence that the number of cyclists and pedestrians killed increased by about 10 per cent.
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: safety
Explanation: The word 'safety' fits grammatically as it is a noun that describes the measures taken to protect oneself from harm. It aligns contextually with the preceding sentence, which discusses precautions taken to reduce the risk of injury, making it the most relevant choice.
Meaning: 'Safety' refers to the condition of being protected from or unlikely to cause danger, risk, or injury, which is the essence of the measures being discussed.
Wrong options:
- great: The word 'great' is an adjective that does not appropriately describe measures; it lacks the specific connotation of protection that 'safety' provides.
- first: The word 'first' implies a sequence or priority, which does not relate to the context of protective measures, making it irrelevant here.
- likely: The word 'likely' suggests probability, which does not fit as it does not describe the nature of the measures being taken.
Correct answer: convictions
Explanation: The term 'convictions' is a noun that refers to firmly held beliefs or opinions, which fits well in the context of re-examining one's beliefs about safety measures. It is grammatically correct and contextually appropriate as it relates to the author's personal beliefs.
Meaning: 'Convictions' means strong beliefs or opinions that someone holds, particularly in the context of personal safety and risk assessment.
Wrong options:
- affirmations: The word 'affirmations' refers to statements of support or agreement, which does not fit the context of personal beliefs being questioned or re-evaluated.
- restrictions: The word 'restrictions' implies limitations or controls, which does not align with the idea of personal beliefs or opinions being reconsidered.
- locations: The word 'locations' refers to places, which is entirely unrelated to the context of beliefs or opinions.
Correct answer: undermined
Explanation: The word 'undermined' is a verb that means to weaken or damage something, which fits grammatically and contextually as it describes how the author's confidence has been affected by the arguments presented by Adams. It conveys a sense of loss of trust in the previously held beliefs.
Meaning: 'Undermined' means to weaken or damage something, particularly in terms of confidence or trust, which is relevant to the author's experience.
Wrong options:
- selected: The word 'selected' implies choosing something, which does not fit the context of affecting confidence; it does not convey the intended meaning of weakening.
- restored: The word 'restored' suggests bringing something back to a previous state, which contradicts the context of losing confidence.
- directed: The word 'directed' implies guiding or managing, which does not relate to the concept of confidence being weakened.
Correct answer: in spite of
Explanation: The phrase 'in spite of' is a prepositional phrase that indicates a contrast or concession, fitting grammatically and contextually as it introduces the idea that the argument holds despite the claims made about seat belts saving lives.
Meaning: 'In spite of' means regardless of or despite something, indicating that the argument is valid even when faced with opposing claims.
Wrong options:
- in thought of: The phrase 'in thought of' is not a standard expression in English and does not convey the intended meaning of contrast or concession.
- in lot of: The phrase 'in lot of' is grammatically incorrect and does not make sense in this context, lacking clarity and meaning.
- in kind of: The phrase 'in kind of' does not fit grammatically or contextually, as it does not convey the intended contrast between the argument and the claims.
Correct answer: compulsory
Explanation: The word 'compulsory' is an adjective that means required by law or rule, fitting grammatically and contextually as it describes the legal requirement for wearing seat belts. It aligns with the discussion about laws and safety measures.
Meaning: 'Compulsory' means mandatory or required, indicating that wearing seat belts is not optional but a legal obligation.
Wrong options:
- rested: The word 'rested' is a verb that does not fit the context of legal requirements; it is unrelated to the concept of obligation.
- necessary: The word 'necessary' is an adjective that implies something is needed, but it lacks the legal connotation that 'compulsory' provides.
- lacking: The word 'lacking' suggests absence, which contradicts the context of discussing a requirement; it does not fit the sentence structure.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation