Sadly, Iowan crops are no longer flourishing in one of America’s agricultural heartlands. The issue is that the rich, fertile top layer of soil is becoming much thinner and is on the verge of disappearing entirely. Not only does that rob the land extra vital nutrients, but it also means that it loses a certain amount of protection against the elements. This could explain why acidity levels in the soil seem to be changing.
In many instances, this situation arose as a result of over-farming. The processing of the land has taken its toll, but it’s not too late to bring the land back to its former glory.
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: on a par
Explanation: The phrase 'on a par' indicates equality or similarity in quality or status, which fits grammatically and contextually as it compares Iowa's soil quality with that of other regions. It aligns with the sentiment of the sentence, emphasizing Iowa's exceptional soil quality.
Meaning: 'On a par' means being equal to something in quality or status, suggesting that few places can match Iowa's fertile soil.
Wrong options:
- wrong_option_1: 'On the level' implies honesty or straightforwardness, which does not fit the context of comparing soil quality.
- wrong_option_2: 'In league' suggests a partnership or alliance, which is not relevant in this context of comparing soil quality.
- wrong_option_3: 'At one' typically refers to agreement or harmony, which does not convey the intended meaning of comparison in this context.
Correct answer: ultimately
Explanation: The word 'ultimately' indicates a final outcome or conclusion, which fits well in the context of addressing soil erosion. It suggests that unless action is taken, the end result will be detrimental, aligning with the urgency of the sentence.
Meaning: 'Ultimately' means in the end or finally, emphasizing the importance of taking action to prevent soil erosion.
Wrong options:
- wrong_option_1: 'Basically' suggests a fundamental aspect but lacks the urgency needed in this context.
- wrong_option_2: 'Inevitably' implies certainty but does not convey the proactive sense of taking action that 'ultimately' does.
- wrong_option_3: 'Virtually' means nearly or almost, which does not fit the context of discussing the finality of halting erosion.
Correct answer: as they once did
Explanation: The phrase 'as they once did' refers to a previous state of flourishing crops, fitting grammatically and contextually as it compares the current situation to a past one. It captures the sentiment of decline in crop health.
Meaning: 'As they once did' means in the same way that they used to flourish, indicating a decline from a previous state.
Wrong options:
- wrong_option_1: 'As far as they could have done' implies potential rather than actual past performance, which does not fit the context of decline.
- wrong_option_2: 'As they used to be' is grammatically awkward and less precise than 'as they once did' in this context.
- wrong_option_3: 'Just as before' suggests a direct comparison without acknowledging the decline, which does not fit the context.
Correct answer: of
Explanation: The preposition 'of' indicates possession or loss, fitting grammatically and contextually as it describes what the land is losing. It aligns with the structure of the sentence regarding the nutrients taken from the land.
Meaning: 'Of' indicates belonging or association, in this case, the nutrients that the land is losing.
Wrong options:
- wrong_option_1: 'From' suggests a source rather than loss, which does not fit the context of the sentence.
- wrong_option_2: 'Through' implies a process or means, which is not appropriate in this context of loss.
- wrong_option_3: 'Once' does not function as a preposition and does not fit grammatically.
Correct answer: relentless
Explanation: The word 'relentless' describes something that is persistent and unyielding, fitting grammatically and contextually as it characterizes the ongoing nature of land processing. It conveys the severity of the situation effectively.
Meaning: 'Relentless' means unceasingly intense or harsh, indicating that the processing of the land has been continuous and damaging.
Wrong options:
- wrong_option_1: 'Repetitive' suggests something that occurs again and again but lacks the intensity implied by 'relentless.'
- wrong_option_2: 'Remorseless' implies a lack of pity or compassion, which does not accurately describe the nature of land processing in this context.
- wrong_option_3: 'Regulation' refers to rules or laws, which does not fit the context of describing the processing of land.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation