Charisma is really a process - an interaction between the of the charismatic leader, the followers and their needs and identification with the leader, and the situation that for a charismatic leader, such as a need for change or a crisis. But when it comes to the charismatic qualities of leaders, the emphasis is on how they communicate to followers and whether they are able to gain followers' trust, and influence and persuade them .
Most politicians, particularly on the national scene, their ability to communicate effectively - to make speeches, 'work the room' with potential donors and supporters, etc. So many seasoned politicians have a lot of 'personal charisma'.
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: arouse
Explanation: The verb 'arouse' fits grammatically as it is in the base form, which is appropriate after 'able to'. Contextually, it indicates the action of evoking strong emotions, aligning with the overall theme of charismatic leaders inspiring their followers.
Meaning: To 'arouse' means to evoke or awaken a feeling or emotion in someone.
Wrong options:
- compel: While 'compel' means to force or drive someone to do something, it does not fit the context of evoking emotions directly as 'arouse' does.
- enlarge: The verb 'enlarge' means to make something bigger, which does not relate to the emotional context of the sentence.
- lift: Although 'lift' can mean to elevate or raise, it is not commonly used to describe the act of evoking emotions in this context.
Correct answer: qualities
Explanation: The noun 'qualities' is appropriate as it refers to the characteristics of the charismatic leader, fitting grammatically in the plural form to match the context of the sentence discussing multiple traits.
Meaning: 'Qualities' refers to the attributes or characteristics that define someone, in this case, the traits of a charismatic leader.
Wrong options:
- influence: 'Influence' is a noun that refers to the power to affect others, but it does not fit as a descriptor of the leader's characteristics in this context.
- significances: 'Significances' refers to meanings or importance, which does not align with the context of describing leader traits.
- developments: 'Developments' refers to the process of developing or evolving, which is not relevant to the characteristics of a leader.
Correct answer: calls out
Explanation: The phrase 'calls out' is grammatically correct as it indicates a situation that demands attention or action, fitting well in the context of needing a charismatic leader during specific circumstances.
Meaning: To 'call out' means to demand or require something, in this case, the need for a charismatic leader in certain situations.
Wrong options:
- calls in: 'Calls in' suggests summoning someone or something, which does not fit the context of needing a leader.
- calls down: 'Calls down' implies a negative connotation of summoning or reprimanding, which is not suitable here.
- calls off: 'Calls off' means to cancel something, which does not relate to the context of needing a leader.
Correct answer: to follow
Explanation: The phrase 'to follow' is grammatically correct as it indicates the purpose of gaining trust and influence, fitting logically in the context of persuading followers.
Meaning: 'To follow' means to support or adhere to someone’s leadership or guidance.
Wrong options:
- following: 'Following' is a gerund that does not fit grammatically as it does not indicate purpose in this context.
- about following: 'About following' is awkward and does not convey a clear purpose or action related to the context of persuasion.
- for following: 'For following' suggests a reason but does not fit the intended meaning of persuading someone to take action.
Correct answer: have developed
Explanation: The phrase 'have developed' is in the present perfect tense, which is appropriate here as it indicates an action that has occurred over time and is relevant to the present, fitting the context of politicians' ongoing communication skills.
Meaning: 'Have developed' means that politicians have acquired or improved their communication skills over time.
Wrong options:
- will develop: 'Will develop' suggests a future action, which does not fit the context of established skills in the present.
- are developing: 'Are developing' indicates an ongoing action, which does not align with the established ability of seasoned politicians.
- were developing: 'Were developing' is in the past tense, which does not fit the current relevance of their communication skills.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation