So what motivates someone to introduce a virus into the computer systems of innocent victims? Perhaps it's simply the desire to prove that it can be done. Or because it gives the kind of pleasure you get from solving a difficult problem - nowadays people protect their computers with all sorts of security software, so it takes considerable to break through all the defences and introduce a virus.
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: fact
Explanation: The word 'fact' fits grammatically as a noun that indicates a reality or truth, aligning with the context of discussing computer viruses as a known occurrence since the 1980s. It establishes the seriousness of the situation, which is essential for the sentence's meaning.
Meaning: 'Fact' refers to something that is known or proven to be true, emphasizing that computer viruses are a real and acknowledged issue.
Wrong options:
- threat: While 'threat' could fit contextually, it implies a potential danger rather than a confirmed reality, making it less suitable here.
- reality: 'Reality' is similar to 'fact' but is less precise in this context, as it does not convey the same level of certainty about the existence of computer viruses.
- theory: 'Theory' suggests a hypothesis or speculation, which contradicts the established nature of computer viruses as a factual occurrence.
Correct answer: distinct
Explanation: The word 'distinct' is appropriate as it describes the various types of computer infections as being clearly different from one another, fitting both grammatically and contextually within the sentence.
Meaning: 'Distinct' means clearly different or unique, indicating that there are various types of computer infections that are not the same.
Wrong options:
- precise: 'Precise' refers to exactness, which does not convey the idea of variety among types, making it unsuitable here.
- distinguished: 'Distinguished' implies a level of honor or recognition, which does not apply to types of infections in this context.
- isolated: 'Isolated' suggests separation or being alone, which does not accurately describe the relationship between the types of infections.
Correct answer: speaking
Explanation: The word 'speaking' fits grammatically as a gerund that describes the action of the Trojan, aligning with the context of explaining what it is not. It maintains the sentence's flow and clarity.
Meaning: 'Speaking' in this context means to communicate or convey information, indicating that the Trojan does not function as a virus despite its deceptive appearance.
Wrong options:
- saying: 'Saying' is less formal and does not fit the grammatical structure needed here, as it does not convey the same nuance as 'speaking.'
- telling: 'Telling' implies giving information, but it does not fit the context of describing the Trojan's nature as effectively as 'speaking.'
- talking: 'Talking' is informal and does not match the tone of the sentence, making it less appropriate in this context.
Correct answer: unsuspecting
Explanation: The word 'unsuspecting' is suitable as it describes the operator who is unaware of the potential danger, fitting both grammatically and contextually within the sentence.
Meaning: 'Unsuspecting' means not aware of the potential danger or risk, highlighting the vulnerability of the operator when introducing the Trojan.
Wrong options:
- incredulous: 'Incredulous' means unwilling to believe something, which does not fit the context of the operator's awareness of the Trojan.
- sceptical: 'Sceptical' implies doubt or disbelief, which does not accurately describe the operator's state of mind in this scenario.
- ignorant: 'Ignorant' suggests a lack of knowledge, but it carries a more negative connotation than 'unsuspecting,' which is more neutral.
Correct answer: skill
Explanation: The word 'skill' fits grammatically as a noun that indicates the ability required to overcome security measures, aligning well with the context of discussing the challenges of introducing a virus.
Meaning: 'Skill' refers to the ability to do something well, particularly as a result of practice or training, emphasizing the expertise needed to bypass security defenses.
Wrong options:
- qualifications: 'Qualifications' refer to credentials or certifications, which do not directly relate to the practical ability required in this context.
- courage: 'Courage' implies bravery, which is not the primary requirement for introducing a virus; skill is more relevant here.
- gift: 'Gift' suggests a natural talent, which does not convey the learned ability necessary to break through defenses.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation