Transcript:
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "Architecture can cause both pleasure and trouble, for example London, which has many ugly buildings. In fact, a bad building has a serious impact on the people around it. No one knows what beautiful is, as it's all in the eye of the beholder."
Explanation: This option accurately captures the main idea of the text, which discusses the dual nature of architecture as a source of both pleasure and trouble. It highlights the author's personal experience with ugly buildings in London and emphasizes the long-lasting impact of bad architecture on people. The phrase 'it's all in the eye of the beholder' reflects the author's point about the subjective nature of beauty, aligning well with the text's thesis.
Option 2: "Architecture is very much something that causes us both pleasure and trouble. A bad building has a serious impact for, could be hundreds of years on the people around it."
Explanation: While this option begins correctly by stating that architecture causes both pleasure and trouble, it lacks the specific example of London and the subjective nature of beauty discussed in the text. Additionally, the phrase 'for, could be' is grammatically incorrect and disrupts the flow of the sentence, making it less effective in summarizing the text.
Option 3: "Rome is nice than Milkykings, and San Francisco has the edge of Frankfurt, so we can make that sort of generalization, surely they are somethings we can say about why a building work or why it doesn't."
Explanation: This option misrepresents the text by focusing too heavily on the comparison of cities rather than the broader themes of architecture's impact and beauty. The phrase 'nice than Milkykings' is incorrect and confusing, and the overall structure lacks coherence. It fails to address the main ideas of pleasure, trouble, and the subjective nature of beauty in architecture.
Option 4: "Books really attempt to suggest why architecture works when it does and what might going to be wrong when it doesn't work."
Explanation: This option focuses solely on the role of books in discussing architecture, which is a minor point in the text. It does not capture the main themes of pleasure, trouble, and the subjective nature of beauty. Furthermore, the phrase 'might going to be wrong' is grammatically incorrect, making the option less effective as a summary.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation