Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #47326 Long Architecture
Instructions ›
You will hear a recording. Click on the paragraph that best relates to the recording.
It seems to me that architecture is very much something that causes us both pleasure and trouble. I live in the part of Western London where I think many of the streets are, where I live, are really, really ugly. And this distresses me every time I walk to a supermarket or walk to a tube. I think, why did they build that, terribly without architecture? It lasts so long, and if you write a bad book or do a bad play, you know, I will be shocked when it is showed and no one would suffer. A bad building has a serious impact for, could be hundreds of years on the people around it. And suppose the book arose a little bit from frustration, almost anger, and there is so much bad architecture around. And then I realized if you talk about architecture, you will say, Why buildings are not more beautiful And you will say, I can use such a word as beauty. That's a really arrogant word and no one knows what beautiful is. It's all in the eye of the beholder. I couldn't help but think that actually. Well, you know that we all attempt to agree that Rome is nice, nicer than Bilkey King. San Francisco has the edge of Frankfurt. So we can make that sort of generalization. Surely there are some things we can say about why a building works or why it doesn't. So the books really attempt to suggest why architecture works when it does and what might be going to be wrong when it doesn't work.
* Click on the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "Architecture can cause both pleasure and trouble, for example London, which has many ugly buildings. In fact, a bad building has a serious impact on the people around it. No one knows what beautiful is, as it's all in the eye of the beholder."

Explanation: This option accurately captures the main idea of the text, which discusses the dual nature of architecture as a source of both pleasure and trouble. It highlights the author's personal experience with ugly buildings in London and emphasizes the long-lasting impact of bad architecture on people. The phrase 'it's all in the eye of the beholder' reflects the author's point about the subjective nature of beauty, aligning well with the text's thesis.

Option 2: "Architecture is very much something that causes us both pleasure and trouble. A bad building has a serious impact for, could be hundreds of years on the people around it."

Explanation: While this option begins correctly by stating that architecture causes both pleasure and trouble, it lacks the specific example of London and the subjective nature of beauty discussed in the text. Additionally, the phrase 'for, could be' is grammatically incorrect and disrupts the flow of the sentence, making it less effective in summarizing the text.

Option 3: "Rome is nice than Milkykings, and San Francisco has the edge of Frankfurt, so we can make that sort of generalization, surely they are somethings we can say about why a building work or why it doesn't."

Explanation: This option misrepresents the text by focusing too heavily on the comparison of cities rather than the broader themes of architecture's impact and beauty. The phrase 'nice than Milkykings' is incorrect and confusing, and the overall structure lacks coherence. It fails to address the main ideas of pleasure, trouble, and the subjective nature of beauty in architecture.

Option 4: "Books really attempt to suggest why architecture works when it does and what might going to be wrong when it doesn't work."

Explanation: This option focuses solely on the role of books in discussing architecture, which is a minor point in the text. It does not capture the main themes of pleasure, trouble, and the subjective nature of beauty. Furthermore, the phrase 'might going to be wrong' is grammatically incorrect, making the option less effective as a summary.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Saving...