In the paragraph, why does the author include the information that dinosaurs had flourished for tens of millions of years and then suddenly disappeared?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "To explain why paleontologists have always been intrigued by the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous"
Explanation: This option is correct because the text highlights the long period during which dinosaurs flourished followed by their sudden disappearance, which is a key reason for paleontologists' intrigue regarding this mass extinction.
Option 1: "To support the claim that the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous is the best-documented of the dozen or so mass extinctions in the geological record"
Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text does not directly link the flourishing of dinosaurs to the documentation of the mass extinction. The focus is on the impact of the extinction itself rather than its documentation.
Option 2: "To explain why as many as half of the species on Earth at the time are believed to have become extinct at the end of the Cretaceous"
Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text does not provide a direct explanation for the extinction of half the species. It mentions the extinction but does not connect it to the flourishing of dinosaurs.
Option 4: "To provide evidence that an impact can be large enough to disturb the environment of the entire planet and cause an ecological disaster"
Explanation: This option is correct as it connects the information about the dinosaurs' flourishing and sudden disappearance to the broader theme of ecological disturbance caused by large impacts, supporting the idea that such events can lead to significant environmental changes.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation