Very exciting discoveries have finally allowed scientists to reconstruct the most likely origins of cetaceans. In 1979, a team looking for fossils in northern Pakistan found what proved to be the oldest fossil whale. The fossil was officially named Pakicetus in honor of the country where the discovery was made. Pakicetus was found embedded in rocks formed from river deposits that were 52 million years old. The river that formed these deposits was actually not far from an ancient ocean known as the Tethys Sea.
The fossil consists of a complete skull of an archaeocyte, an extinct group of ancestors of modern cetaceans. Although limited to a skull, the Pakicetus fossil provides precious details on the origins of cetaceans. The skull is cetacean-like but its jawbones lack the enlarged space that is filled with fat or oil and used for receiving underwater sound in modern whales. Pakicetus probably detected sound through the ear opening as in land mammals. The skull also lacks a blowhole, another cetacean adaptation for diving. Other features, however, show experts that Pakicetus is a transitional form between a group of extinct flesh-eating mammals, the mesonychids, and cetaceans. It has been suggested that
Pakicetus fed on fish in shallow water and was not yet adapted for life in the open ocean. It probably bred and gave birth on land. Another major discovery was made in Egypt in 1989. Several skeletons of another early whale, Basilosaurus, were found in sediments left by the Tethys Sea and now exposed in the Sahara desert. This whale lived around 40 million years ago, 12 million years after Pakicetus. Many incomplete skeletons were found but they included, for the first time in an archaeo[1]cyte, a complete hind leg that features a foot with three tiny toes. Such legs would have been far too small to have supported the 50-foot-long Basilosaurus on land. Basilosauruswas undoubtedly a fully marine whale with possibly nonfunctional, or vestigial, hind legs.
An even more exciting find was reported in 1994, also from Pakistan. The now extinct whale Ambulocetus natans (“the walking whale that swam”) lived in the Tethys Sea 49 millionyears ago. It lived around 3 million years after Pakicetus but 9 million years before Basilosaurus. The fossil luckily includes a good portion of the hind legs. The legs were strong and ended in long feet very much like those of a modern pinniped. The legs were certainly functional both on land and at sea. The whale retained a tail and lacked a fluke, the major means of locomotion in modern cetaceans. The structure of the backbone shows, however, that Ambu[1]locetus swam like modern whales by moving the rear portion of its body up and down, even though a fluke was missing. The large hind legs were used for propulsion in water. On land, where it probably bred and gave birth, Ambulocetus may have moved around very much like a modern sea lion. It was undoubtedly a whale that linked life on land with life at sea.
Select answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage.
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "Recent discoveries of fossils have helped to show the link between land mammals and cetaceans."
Explanation: This option accurately reflects the main idea of the text, which discusses how recent fossil discoveries, particularly those of Pakicetus, Ambulocetus, and Basilosaurus, have illuminated the evolutionary link between land mammals and cetaceans. The text emphasizes the significance of these findings in reconstructing the origins of cetaceans, thus supporting this option.
Option 2: "The discovery of Ambulocetus natans provided evidence for a whale that lived both on land and at sea."
Explanation: This option is correct as it highlights a key point in the text regarding Ambulocetus natans, which is described as a whale that had functional hind legs for movement both on land and in water. The text states that Ambulocetus may have moved like a modern sea lion on land, thus supporting the idea that it lived in both environments.
Option 3: "The skeleton of Basilosaurus was found in what had been the Tethys Sea, an area rich in fossil evidence."
Explanation: While the text mentions that Basilosaurus skeletons were found in sediments left by the Tethys Sea, it does not emphasize the area as being 'rich in fossil evidence.' This statement is too broad and lacks specific support from the text, making it an incomplete representation of the information provided.
Option 4: "Pakicetus is the oldest fossil whale yet to be found."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because, although Pakicetus is described as the oldest fossil whale found, the text does not state that it is the oldest whale ever. The phrasing 'yet to be found' implies that there could be older fossils undiscovered, which is not supported by the text.
Option 5: "Fossils thought to be transitional forms between walking mammals and swimming whales were found."
Explanation: This option correctly summarizes a significant theme in the text, which discusses the discovery of fossils like Pakicetus and Ambulocetus as transitional forms that bridge the gap between land mammals and cetaceans. The text explicitly mentions these fossils as evidence of evolutionary links, thus validating this option.
Option 6: "Ambulocetus’s hind legs were used for propulsion in the water."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because, while the text states that Ambulocetus had strong hind legs, it emphasizes that these legs were used for propulsion in water, but does not specify that they were the primary means of propulsion. The text indicates that the whale swam like modern whales, suggesting a more complex locomotion method, making this statement too narrow.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation