Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers ID: #5592 Trees 2
Instructions ›
Read the text and answer the question by selecting all the correct responses. You will need to select more than one response.
Klaus Lackner has designed an artificial tree to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the air using 'leaves' that have proved to be 1,000 times more efficient than the real thing.
In addition, real leaves need sunlight but research has shown that the artificial leaves do not. The surface of the papery leaves is coated with plastic that contains a chemical which takes CO2 out of the air and stores it. To remove the CO2, the leaves are washed with water once a month or as needed. They can then dry naturally in the wind, taking in more CO2.
Lackner calculates that his tree can remove one ton of CO2 a day. Ten million of these trees could remove 3.6 billion tons of CO2 a year - equal to about 10% of our global annual CO2 production.
He suggests that the stores of CO2 could be turned into liquid fuels to power vehicles. And indeed, past research has shown that this is possible. Whether it is economical or not is a different question. Lackner has argued that his trees would cost around $200 for each ton of CO2 removed from the atmosphere and this could drop to $30 a ton as the project becomes bigger. While other people claim this figure is unrealistic (some calculate it at $600 per ton), it is clear that the project will only be economically possible at $30 if oil companies buy the liquid fuels for around $100 per ton, which has yet to be decided.

According to the writer, which of the following are true of Klaus Lackner's man-made trees?

* Click on the correct answers

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 1: "They do not depend on weather conditions to work."

Explanation: The text states that real leaves need sunlight, but the artificial leaves do not require sunlight to function. This indicates that Klaus Lackner's man-made trees are not dependent on weather conditions, making this option correct.

Option 2: "Their leaves have a similar appearance to real leaves."

Explanation: The text does not mention the appearance of the artificial leaves in relation to real leaves. Therefore, we cannot conclude that they look similar, making this option incorrect.

Option 3: "The CO2 is cleaned off their leaves by rain."

Explanation: The text specifies that the CO2 is removed from the leaves by washing them with water, not by rain. This contradicts the statement in this option, making it incorrect.

Option 4: "They remove more CO2 than real trees."

Explanation: The text states that Klaus Lackner's artificial leaves are 1,000 times more efficient than real leaves at removing CO2. This clearly supports the claim that they remove more CO2 than real trees, making this option correct.

Option 5: "CO2 collected from them has no identified uses."

Explanation: The text mentions that the CO2 collected could potentially be turned into liquid fuels, indicating that there are identified uses for the CO2. Therefore, this option is incorrect.

Option 6: "Nobody knows accurately how much they will cost."

Explanation: The text discusses differing opinions on the cost of removing CO2, with some claiming it could be as high as $600 per ton, while Lackner estimates it could drop to $30 per ton. This uncertainty about the actual cost supports the correctness of this option.

Option 7: "Oil companies have expressed an interest in them."

Explanation: The text states that it is unclear whether oil companies will buy the liquid fuels produced from the CO2, indicating a lack of expressed interest. Thus, this option is incorrect.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...