Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Single Answer ID: #4649 Medium Aliens
Instructions ›
Listen to the recording and answer the multiple-choice question by selecting the correct response. Only one response is correct.
Aliens are real, and the government is covering up their existence. This seemed to be the general consensus in my student days; everyone thought that global leaders were keeping such a monumental discovery to themselves because they thought knowledge of this kind would lead to panic and hysteria in the world's population. Well, it appears that our assumption of benevolent concern for our mental well-being was misplaced. Michael Varnum, a professor of psychology at Arizona State University, has conducted research into how humankind would react to the news of the discovery of extra-terrestrial life. His team analysed public reaction to news reports announcing 'discoveries' of this kind which later turned out to be spurious; for example, the discredited 1996 announcement of fossilized microbes on Mars. They looked at words used in news reports, government memos and press releases and determined whether they were negative or positive about the discoveries. The vocabulary in these documents was also judged to determine whether it indicated a greater sense of risk or reward. Overall, society considered news about alien life to be positive and reward-oriented. Of course, this is all hypothetical, and the reports were about microbial life and not enemy spacecrafts; however.

What does the speaker say about the discovery of alien life?

* Listen to the recording and select the correct answer

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 3: "Fear that the public would react badly to news of alien life is unfounded."

Explanation: The speaker argues that the assumption of a negative public reaction to the discovery of alien life is misplaced. The research conducted by Michael Varnum indicates that society generally considers such news to be positive and reward-oriented, supporting the idea that fears of panic are unfounded.

Option 1: "That any life discovered would almost certainly be microbial."

Explanation: The text mentions the discredited announcement of fossilized microbes on Mars but does not state that any life discovered would almost certainly be microbial. This option misrepresents the speaker's focus on public reaction rather than the type of life discovered.

Option 2: "When bacterial life was found on Mars there was a mixed reaction to it."

Explanation: The text refers to a specific case where the announcement of microbial life was discredited, but it does not indicate that there was a mixed reaction. Instead, it suggests that society viewed news about alien life positively, contradicting the idea of a mixed reaction.

Option 4: "The public would want some sort of reward for finding extra-terrestrial life."

Explanation: While the text mentions that society viewed news about alien life as positive and reward-oriented, it does not imply that the public would want a reward. This option misinterprets the context, as it suggests a desire for reward rather than a general positive outlook.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...