Whenever, beyond any doubt, these causes are found to be present, the scientist knows the event will follow. Of course, all that he really knows is that such results have always followed similar causes in the past. But he has come to have faith in the uniformity and regularity of nature.
Which of the following cannot be the characteristic of a person with a scientific bent of mind?
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Option 4: "He can see beyond facts and establish relationship between any unrelated things."
Explanation: This option is correct because the text emphasizes that a scientist sees the significance of facts and understands causal relationships. However, the phrase 'any unrelated things' suggests a lack of critical analysis, which is not a characteristic of a scientific mind. A scientist does not simply connect unrelated facts without establishing a causal link.
Option 1: "He tends to organize his knowledge in the light of facts."
Explanation: This option describes a characteristic of a scientist, as the text states that a scientist organizes knowledge and sees the significance of facts. Therefore, this cannot be the characteristic of a person with a scientific bent of mind.
Option 2: "He seeks to predict the outcome of a phenomenon based on prior observations."
Explanation: This option aligns with the text, which explains that a scientist predicts events based on understanding causes and prior observations. Thus, this is not a characteristic that would be absent in a scientific mind.
Option 3: "He likes to bring order out of chaos."
Explanation: This option is consistent with the text, as it implies that a scientist seeks to understand and organize knowledge, which is a key aspect of scientific thinking. Therefore, this cannot be the characteristic of someone lacking a scientific bent of mind.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation